One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life (Psalm 27:4)                 Bayith Ministries

Bayith Home  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues  |  Covid-19 Home Page

SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2  /  SARS-CoV-2 Plus ACE2
aka: The Chinese Wuhan Coronavirus or WuFlu

Contact Tracing, Test and Trace
PCR Tests, 'Cases', 'Infections'
Government Surveillance Grid

Operation Moonshot   |   Kary Mullis: Inventor of PCR   |   PCR Tests / False Positives

'Cases' and 'Infections' / Symptoms   |   PCR Testing Sites / Laboratories   |   PCR Tests: Legal Challenges

Lateral Flow Tests   |   Antibody Tests   |   Conflating Flu and Covid   |   Contact Tracing

Quotes and Comments   |   Summary PCR Tests   |   Covid-19 Home Page   |   Wake-Up Folks

As In the Days of Noah   |   What is Covid-19?   |   Fear is the Little Death

Coronavirus Act: What Are We Consenting To?   |   Bayith Articles on C19   |      |   The A-Z of Covid19   |   Agenda 21/2030

Deep Ecology and Population Control   |   Scriptures to Strengthen Us   |   Political Cultural and Social Issues

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits"
"Prove all things: hold fast that which is good"
(1 John 4:1a; 1 Thessalonians 5:21)

0-19yrs = 99.997%,   20-49yrs = 99.98%,   50-69yrs = 99.5%,   70+yrs = 94.6%
[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA].

"Instant imposition of a [statist] totalitarian system. Individuality suppressed. Families divided.
Religious, cultural, educational institutions closed down. Work, movement, information regulated by the state. Life and death decided by the state.
The transformation has been so successful here because it builds upon a deeply entrenched pre-existing machinery and ideology of welfare,
in which a large proportion of the people has come to believe it has a right and need to be looked after from cradle to grave by the government.
All they required was a pretext, an excuse -- no matter how flimsy -- and completely by coincidence the CCP flu virus arrived at the perfect moment..."

[comment at source].

"[W]ith PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody ...
It doesn't tell you that you're sick"
[Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

"This test is monstrously unsuitable for detecting who has live virus in their airway"
[Dr. Mike Yeardon, source].

"This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens"
[CDC, quoted at source].

"So, who did you come in contact with?
Let's look at your phone and social media and jog your memory...
Your family needs to be quarantined for 14 days and maybe longer,
Everyone sitting in the same [carriage] on the train as you,
People you work with ... People in the restaurant you were in could get quarantined again and again and again.
Even though you're healthy and never sick you will not be allowed to leave your house.
What is the purpose of Contact Tracing?..."

"For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind"
(2 Timothy 1:7)

Peace ~ Be Still ~ Lay All Your Worries Down
"Be still, O my soul, for our God is in control"



Operation Moonshot / Mass Testing

Matt Hancock's Medical Industrial Complex Will Destroy the UK Economy  (25 November 2020)

"Hancock has bet the farm on Covid-testing - and now wants to justify this massive white elephant by keeping the entire country on endless health alert, forever taking more and more tests, cementing the power of the NHS and making it an even more inescapable part of daily life. At the cost of billions, Hancock is rejecting millennia of normal human behaviour, completely rewriting the rules of how to behave when you are ill. Up till now - unless you're knocked sideways by a flu that leaves you bedridden - people have carried on working through illness for a number of sound reasons. These include resilience ... a general understanding that we all get ill now and again but that it's really no big deal. Now Hancock wants us to become rampant hypochondriacs forever dependent on the Medical-Industrial Complex..."

Operation Moonshot: What Do the Leaked Documents Say?  (11 September 2020)

"Operation Moonshot is the name of the UK government's newly proposed covid-19 mass testing scheme. The plan ... involves an expansion of testing from the current hundreds of thousands of tests each day to 10 million a day by early 2021. But how does the government propose to do this?..."

Moonshot Testing Plan 'Could Send 28 Million Into Needless Self-Isolation'  (10 September 2020)

"Boris Johnson: 'I want every Briton to take a Covid test every morning' ... SAGE paper warns mass testing would create so many 'false positives' that 41% of population could end up self-isolating ... SAGE, chaired by Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government chief scientific adviser, warns: 'In populations with low prevalence of infection, mass testing... would result in many individuals receiving false positive results'..."


Kary Mullis: Inventor PCR

"[W]ith PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody ... if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of PCR ... the measurement ... is not exact at all ... the results are inferred, in a sense ... [the PCR test is] just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick" [Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

"If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR" [Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

The COVID-19 Test Wasn't Meant for Detecting Viruses  (16 April 2020)

"The PCR is currently the most commonly used COVID-19 test both in the US and globally. PCR was invented by Kary Mullis in 1985 but it was not invented with the purpose of detecting disease. It's primary intended applications included biomedical research and criminal forensics. It is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely deceptive in the diagnosis of infectious disease and the inventor himself argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool for infections..."

YOUTUBE:  Kary Mullis: Nobel Chemistry Prize Winner and Inventor of the PCR Test  (12 July 1997)

"[W]ith PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody ... if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of PCR ... the measurement ... is not exact at all ... the results are inferred, in a sense ... [the PCR test is] just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick..."


PCR Tests / False Positives

"This test is monstrously unsuitable for detecting who has live virus in their airway" [Dr. Mike Yeardon, source].

BRANDNEWTUBE:  The PCR Test is Useless for Covid-19  (23 January 2021)

"The pointless lockdowns, the stupid social distancing rules, and the absurd and very dangerous insistence on mask wearing, and the immensely dangerous experimental vaccination programme, are all being driven by the testing programme. As the number of tests being done increases, so the number of people who appear to have Covid-19 also increases, but many of the individuals who are said to have Covid-19, don't have it. These are what's known as 'false positives' ... a positive PCR test does NOT mean that an individual has ANY infection at all, let alone Covid-19..."

BRANDNEWTUBE:  Following the Science? Don't Make Me Laugh  (19 January 2021)

"It is claimed that 2 million people have died of Covid-19 in the 14 or 15 months that this scam has been running. That's a tragedy of course, and to out it into perspective, we should always remember that up to 650,000 people can die in a 6 month flu season. And there have been very, very few cases of flu in the last year. Very mysteriously, the flu seems to have disappeared and been replaced with Covid-19..."

BRANDNEWTUBE:  Documentary: The New Normal  (14 January 2021)

Viewers' comments:  "Thank you good people for an excellent documentary"  /  "Excellent presentation... very sad so many go along with all of this - blind trust of the governments, blind trust of the political Public Health officials and total trust in MSM narratives"  /  "Anyone who isn't already aware of everything covered in this film hasn't been paying much attention"  /  "I don't hear the word 'freedom' very much when these globalists were talking"  /  "These idiots haven't taken God into account. When He shows His hand He will give them an almighty slap!"  /  "God help us, the truth will be exposed"  /  "Sadly this documentary will most likely be deleted and labelled as 'conspiracy theory' very soon"  /  "'The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants' (Albert Camus)"  /  "We have a government of occupation in the UK (UK Column)"

The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic  (30 November 2020)

"Now, in late November, we are told there are sometimes 25,000 new 'cases' daily and that several hundred daily 'COVID-19 deaths' are occurring ... A 'case' is a positive PCR tests. No symptoms are involved. A 'COVID-19 admission' to a hospital is  a person testing positive by PCR before, on entry or at any time during a hospital stay, no matter the reason for the admission or the symptoms the patient is presenting. A 'COVID-19 death' is any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test ... How can this PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic be occurring?..."

Tiers Based on Faulty Testing  (27 November 2020)

"As MPs' get ready to vote on the Government's Tiers for England, an academic report reveals that their figures on Covid 'cases' and deaths are all a work of fiction ... The academics have sent a copy of their paper to every MP. We are now urging you to use this link to the Parliament website to email your MP and demand the end to all restrictions, masks, anti-social distancing, across the whole UK. Ask you MP to vote against the Government proposals..."

YOUTUBE:  Richard Tice Steaming with Frustration and Incandescent Anger Over Government Covid Tiers  (27 November 2020)

Mr Tice said the government 'are not running the country. They are ruining it'..."  /  Viewers' comments:  "Don't take any tests. Don't take the vaccine and don't obey any daft rules. Take no notice of Boris and his mates"  /  "Making healthy people feel like they are ill is so dark. It's unreal that people still buy this pandemic nonsense"  /  "Get the doctors and nurses back to work. These tests are rubbish and they could well be keeping people off duty that are fine"  /  "Finally someone in the media is talking about the Liverpool testing ... There are now 2 different tests telling the opposite story to PCR"  /  "Hancock was at a loss to understand how positive cases had plummeted"  /  "They will stop using the PCR test and when the numbers fall they will say lockdown worked"  /  "How to get rid of covid. Don't have a test and open all the shops. Stop watching the main stream media"

PCR-Based COVID Has Failed and is Not A Proper Basis to Lockdown the Nation, Let Alone Decide on Tiers for Restriction  (26 November 2020)

Briefing Paper for MPs:  Across Europe, including in the UK, we see the following: (1) Daily 'cases' sky-rocketing in Europe as Autumn arrived; (2) Daily deaths labelled as 'COVID deaths' rose in line with 'cases' - to levels apparently higher than at the Spring peak; (3) BUT: Total all-cause mortality does not reflect the above.  What is behind this conundrum? ... we have a major problem with PCR testing. This is distorting policy and creating the illusion that we are in a serious pandemic when in fact we are not. This is causing:..."

YOUTUBE:  Dr Mike Yeardon Explaining PCR Testing  (20 November 2020)

"This test is monstrously unsuitable for detecting who has live virus in their airway"  /  Viewers' comments:  "Thank God for a reasoned and highly informed man of science"  /  "He breaks it down and elucidates it so literally a kid in elementary school could understand. The testing is flawed and [the UK Govt/SAGE] know it"  /  "A crystal clear voice of reason amidst a fog of misinformation and fear mongering"  /  "Really good, clear, calm, rational and intelligent view"  /  Very informative and reflects the common sense (and experience) that most of us already have about flu, recovery and immunity"  /  "Numerous scientists/specialists with his background have been saying the same exact thing but alas our governments seem intent on doing the exact opposite ... false science ... useful idiots ... apparatchiks to rubber stamp their nonsense"  /  "How many people go to the hospitals because of something else, get a positive test, get covid treatment and die because of wrong treatment"  /  "I have been trying to tell people about this test but people don't want to listen"  /  "Politicians simply don't properly understand science, data, analysis, and statistics. Enough is enough, it is time to stop testing and get back to normal life"  /  "It's been about control, money, and reset from day one"  /  "Finally someone who looks at the data"  /  "Brilliantly explained as a genuine scientists and doctor"  /  "Proper science at last"  /  "Thank God for righteous men like you Mike, thank you for explaining the true science. Sadly evil promotes evil and we are likely in the last days that the Bible speaks of and as men reject God the Son, Jesus Christ, God [the Father] will impose wicked kings over the people as judgement for unbelief and wickedness. Our only hope it to believe in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ for forgiveness by God for all our sins and for the gift of eternal life"

The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity Using a 'Test' to Lock Down Society  (05 November 2020)

"All current propaganda on the COVI-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned: Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVIDThis assumption is misleading. Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works ... Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests. In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we sue the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical procedure. We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!..."

Might Most Positive Tests Be Wrong?  (19 October 2020)

"A lot of people are bad with numbers, and especially so in the area of probability. earlier this year (with accidental prescience), in the school where I work, as part of our off-curriculum 'mind-broadening' provision for sixth-formers, a few of my colleagues and I presented students with a puzzle involving imperfect methods of testing for rare conditions. Such puzzles can yield startling results - ones which even bright students are often reluctant to accept. For example, if the incidence of a disease in the population is 0.1% and the test has a false positive rate of 5%, the probability that a randomly-selected individual testing positive actually has the disease is approximately one in fifty: about 2%, or a probability of 0.02..."

More Juggling with the Covid Figures  (12 October 2020)

"I spent Friday morning ... running over the PHE released stats up to October 1 ... there are some interesting findings. Firstly, the number of people admitted [to hospital] with an already positive test is quite low as a percentage of the whole -  about 20% in the last week of September. Most 'admissions' are admitted without a positive test and only become 'positive' after two to five days when the test comes back. But about 6-9% test positive after eight days in hospital and these may be hospital-acquired Covid. Some of those positive swabs will be people with Covid symptoms - but many are admitted with other things and the positive swab is an incidental finding as they don't have any Covid symptoms ... So the reported number of Covid admissions is not the same as the number of patients with Covid symptoms..."

BRAND NEW TUBE:  Debunking the Biggest Lies They Tell  (06 October 2020)  [Transcript]

"[M]any patients are now refusing to have the test done because of the dangers ... in Iowa in America a woman in her 40s started leaking cerebrospinal fluid from her nose after a swab test for covid-19. The nasopharyngeal swab which was used - effectively a very long cotton bud - made a hole which released the vital fluid. That was always going to happen and was absolutely no surprise ... The tests, of course, are pointless as well as potentially harmful..."

YOUTUBE:  We Are Being Lied To! Here Is How...  (04 October 2020)

"President Trump and the First Lady have both tested positive for COVID ... President Trump's doctor said that Trump's diagnosis was confirmed using the PCR test. Just like virtually every other 'confirmed case' we hear reported. But was PCR really developed with the intention of diagnosing infectious diseases? Is PCR capable of diagnosing infectious diseases? How could a test developed almost 40 years ago be used to diagnose a brand new disease found less than one year ago? In this report, we examine this question in addition to reviewing video clips of multiple doctors weighing in on the subject, including the biochemist Kary Mullis who invented PCR and won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for doing so ... Why is understanding the test so important? Because it is the driving factor in the fear campaign that is being driven by the corrupt media and then used by the government to justify restrictions imposed on our lives..."

False Positives and the Never-Ending Epidemic  (02 October 2020)

"Testing is at the heart of the government's response to Covid-19, but the current test for the virus is not 100% reliable ... the more tests you do, the more false positives you are likely to get. So the huge increase in testing since March will have caused a huge increase in the umber of false positives ... their effect is much greater when the vast majority of people are testing negative, as is happening at the moment ... As long as we continue testing, there will always be false positives. That won't change if we have an effective vaccine, and it won't change if the virus disappears completely ... [so] the current crisis with its associated restrictions on our freedoms will go on forever."

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted  (30 September 2020)

"Health experts now say that PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus associated with the illness COVID-19, is too sensitive and needs to be adjusted to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of the virus in their system. The test's threshold is so high that it detects people with the live virus as well as those with a few genetic fragments left over from a past infection that no longer poses a risk. It's like finding a hair in a room after a person left it., says Michael Mina, MD, an epidemiologists at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health..."

Your Coronavirus Test is Positive - But What Does That Mean?  (30 September 2020)

"The mainstream media and Government Covid-19 reporting has recently shifted from deaths and hospitalisations and moved on to 'cases' - but what determines a case and how accurate are the PCR test kits determining those 'cases' ... A growing body of research suggests that a significant number of confirmed Covid-19 infections, possibly as many as 9 out of every 10, may not be infectious at all with much of the testing equipment picking up mere fragments of the disease rather than full blown infections..."

YOUTUBE:  This One Covid Lie Will Bring Down the British Government  (26 September 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "There are now more deaths from flu than CV"  /  "People who rush to get a test because they have a few sniffles are pushing the case numbers up which gives Doris the ammo for a lockdown! Stop taking tests and this will all die down! We have never had tests for flu before and have also never been aware of how many people died. The government are not giving out those figures or the hospital admissions because they are so low. They are sticking to cases to keep the sheeple scared silly"  /  "And yet the public keep going with it all. I think people are so emotionally invested that admitting that they've been conned would be devastating and is just too far beyond their comprehension"

COVID19: 'Test, Test, Test' Is 'Wrong, Wrong, Wrong'  (26 September 2020)

"[A] dose of sanity appeared at the CDC when it finally decided it was probably better policy to not test people who have no symptoms of Covid-19 ... Obviously the announcement triggered dissent from all the profiteers of the scamdemic. This includes the NY Times ... which then went on to lament this step towards common sense by then quoting a string of medical professionals (with skin in the game) who refuse to see the bigger picture of the damage inflicted on society because of the 'lockdown' policies, i.e. the hidden non-COVID deaths due to deferred operations, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, depression, business bankruptcies, domestic abuse, etc ... the more we test, the more these flawed tests will throw out 'asymptomatic' (not sick) positives. This then creates the huge rise in 'casers' reported daily in the media to justify more draconian 'lockdown' measures ... the key to the insanity is the PCR test relied on for 'diagnosing; COVID19 - a test which was never designed or certified to be used as a virus diagnostic tool and is known to be incorrect 90% of the time. It is unscientific and immoral - and possibly criminal - for government(s) to portray it as such..."

Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics - the Deadly Danger of False Positives  (20 September 2020)

"[T]his article [is] about the testing we do with something called PCR, an amplification technique, better known to biologists as a research tool used in our labs, when trying to unpick mechanisms of disease. I was frankly astonished to realise they're sometimes used in population screening for diseases - astonished because it is a very exacting technique, prone to invisible errors and it's quite a tall order to get reliable information out of it, especially because of the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code. The test cannot distinguish between a living virus and a short strand of RNA from a virus which broke into pieces weeks or months ago ... I'm going to go through this with care and in detail because I'm a scientists and dislike where this investigation takes me..."

YOUTUBE:  Dr Mike Yeadon: Government Are Using A Covid-19 Test with Undeclared False Positive Rates  (17 September 2020)

"The former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon, has reissued his challenge to the Health Secretary Matt Hancock regarding the coronavirus testing. Speaking with Julia Hartley-Brewer, Dr Yeadon said the Government are 'using a test with an undeclared false positive rate. That's dreadful. If you don't know what it - shame on you.'  Dr Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to eliminate the possibility of the test being a false positive..."

When is COVID-19 Not COVID-19?  (10 September 2020)

On 7th September PHE announced a change to testing criteria. The change is designed to address the problem of false postivies, people that test positive but do not in fact have COVID-19. The consequences of these false positives stretch far beyond the inconvenience to an individual who has to self-isolate unnecessarily. Counting false positives when a disease is not very prevalent can result in misleading, fear-mongering news articles and mistaken health policies..."

The COVID-19 PCR Test is the Key to the Pandemic Fraud  (08 September 2020)

"Widespread reliance on the PCR for COVID19 testing is beyond stupid. It is criminal because it is pushed as the justification for maintaining 'lockdown' measures and compounding the fear and misery (including economic) much of the world is still suffering as a consequence of this gigantic science fraud. To better appreciate the insanity that has befallen us let's review a little of the history of the PCR test to see how we sank into this nonsensical unscientific morass..."

NFL Has 77 Apparently False Positive Covid-19 Tests from Lab  (23 August 2020)

"Anyone testing positive for COVID-19 - even a false positive upon a retest - is required to have two more negative tests before cleared to return..."

False Positives  (20 August 2020)

"The definition of 'false positive' is important to clarify. One type of false positive would involve detection of not only SARS-CoV-2 but other coronaviruses as well. Perhaps someone who has carefully studied the PCR primers and range of extant human coronavirus sequences could judge how likely this is to occur. A second type of false positive would be the detection of non-infectious viral fragments that can remain in one's respiratory passages for two-three months after the infection has been eliminated by the immune system. However, the class of false positives most people talk about entails contamination of PCR reactions with trace amounts of viral material - which in PCR labs almost always comes from previous reaction products..."

Could Mass Testing for Covid-19 Do More Harm Than Good?  (12 August 2020)

"Making a diagnosis used to be a well understood and practised procedure: take a history from someone presenting with symptoms, examine them and do some tests to arrive at an overall diagnosis. It requires substantial training and experience to put this into practice ... With Covid-19, however, clinical diagnosis is seemingly a secondary consideration in the face of mass testing. All you require is a positive PCR test; no symptoms, no signs, no other diagnostic proof..."

COVID19 PCR Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless  (27 July 2020)

"Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to 'diagnose' Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose. Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify 'positive' patients, whereby 'positive' is usually equated with 'infected' ... these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2 ... The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses..."

The COVID-19 Test Wasn't Meant for Detecting Viruses  (16 April 2020)

"The PCR is currently the most commonly used COVID-19 test both in the US and globally. PCR was invented by Kary Mullis in 1985 but it was not invented with the purpose of detecting disease. It's primary intended applications included biomedical research and criminal forensics. It is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely deceptive in the diagnosis of infectious disease and the inventor himself argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool for infections..."

YOUTUBE:  Kary Mullis: Nobel Chemistry Prize Winner and Inventor of the PCR Test  (12 July 1997)

"[W]ith PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody ... if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of PCR ... the measurement ... is not exact at all ... the results are inferred, in a sense ... [the PCR test is] just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick..."


PCR Tests: 'Cases' and 'Infections'

When Killing People is Government Policy  (06 October 2020)

"The ramping-up of virus tests with the dubious PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) methodology is inevitably showing more 'cases' which in reality may be just harmless fragments of the Covid-19 (or other) coronavirus RNA that can't be transmitted to others. These are not infections and certainly not illnesses. The bar on proof of infection is too low. The government refuses to acknowledge that this increase in cases is largely due to the increased testing, and allows the message to embed in the surrounding narrative that a positive test - which may also be a false positive - is equivalent to being ill when the overwhelming majority of those who are Covid-19 positive don't become ill, let alone die. It is in the business of exaggeration and fearmongering along with most of the mainstream media..."

YOUTUBE:  There's No Possible Justification for Lockdown  (02 October 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "Excellent interview, some common sense for a change"  /  "Ivor has done his homework, as always. Voice of reason"  /  "Ivor as usual speaking truth, facts and common sense"  /  "Ivor Cummings joins the ranks of Carl Heneghan, Sunetra Gupta, Karol Sikora, Michael Levitt, Mike Yeardon, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. These brilliant men and women are presenting solid scientific analysis which the Government are ignoring. WHY?  /  "It seems no matter how many people including doctors and scientists talk against the government's draconian measures, Boris and his corrupted advisors keep following dictated agenda"  /  "One of the problems is that most journalists don't understand the basics of what a PCR test is ... once you have a basic understanding you can then start to understand why a PCR test is not an appropriate test upon which to base a lockdown"

BITCHUTE:  Just Before the Dam Breaks...  (29 September 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "Covid swept through my entire facility in Feb-March before everybody freaked out. We were all chill, 'Hey you got a fever too? Yeah, and this weird lasting painless cough...'  Back to work in two days or less"  /  "If it wasn't for TV, no one would have noticed anything had happened at all. That's not a pandemic"  /  "To add insult to injury, the PCR test. According to Mullis himself, 'PCR cannot be totally and should never be used as a tool in the diagnosis of infectious diseases'"  /  " I find it hard to believe that ANYONE cannot see what's happening here now"  /  "Imagine a virus so deadly that you have to take a test just to see if you have it"  /  "First time in history you have to be told you're sick"

Useless Masks and Covid Tests, Second Waves, and Few Deaths  (14 September 2020)

"It is six weeks since COVID 'cases' (I think this now includes 'infections' determined by increased testing which is not the original definition of 'cases') began to rise. Allowing for the period of infection to death and death registration of about 3-4 weeks, we can see that deaths have not risen in response to infections ... The British (and other governments) are making drastic social and economic decisions based on tests for COVID 19. But are they at all reliable? The experience of a friend in another country is interesting:..."

A Study on Infectivity of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Carriers  (13 May 2020)

"Background: We report here a case of the asymptomatic patient and present clinical characteristics of 455 contacts, which aims to study the infectivity of asymptomatic carriers ... Material and methods: "Three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. We extracted their epidemiological information ... Results: All CT Images showed no sign of COVID-19 infection. No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts ... Conclusion: all the 455 contacts were excluded form SARS-CoV-2 infection..."


PCR Testing Sites / Laboratories

Health and Safety Breaches at the Milton Keynes Lighthouse Lab  (20 November 2020)

"A great deal of pressure has been placed on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the assay used to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 cases. The UK government have invested heavily in several Lighthouse labs for COVID-19 testing, but there have been a growing number of concerns about the reliability of these tests. There's a concern that the PCR assay may be inflating the number of COVID-19 cases by generating false positives ... if you've had COVID-19, or another coronavirus, but are no longer infectious, you may still be shedding small components of the virus and test positive. That risk increases as the number of amplification cycles increases ... [also] when cross-contamination takes place between the samples being tested, so a positive sample can contaminate a negative one, turning them both positive..."

Scandal: PCR Testing Sites Not Fit for Purpose  (04 November 2020)

"We were sent the [report] below by someone employed at a PCR testing site in Salisbury...  I realise the gravity of making this information public and genuinely feel that you are best placed to air my concerns about the fundamentally flawed service provided at testing sites. To be specific, the site operating in Salisbury, which has been awarded/allocated without tender or public scrutiny ... I was accepted for work instantly after applying online at 01.00 in the morning. I filled out a mere two pages of information - no reference checks, no criminal record checks, no photographic ID..."


PCR Tests: Legal Challenges

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests Unreliable & Quarantines Unlawful - Media Blackout  (21 November 2020)

"The Court stated, the test's reliability depends upon the number of cycles used and the viral load present ... 'I someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.' The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection..."

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests "Unreliable" & Quarantines "Unlawful"  (20 November 2020)

"Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable ... The media reaction to this case has been entirely predictable - they have not mentioned it.  At all.  Anywhere.  Ever.  The ruling was published on November 11th, and has been referenced by many alt-news sites since... but the mainstream outlets are maintaining a complete blackout on it..."


Lateral Flow Tests

Army Covid Testing Results from Liverpool  (11 November 2020)

"The scores on the doors from the first few days of mass testing are in and... 23,170 people swabbed with the new 'lateral flow' test (way more reliable than the PCR tests previously used). 162 positive tests. That's 0.7% with a fair chance of a few false positives thrown in (I also accept there could be a few false negatives around). This is, apparently, one of the worst hit parts of the country in the 'DEADLY SECOND WAVE'."  /  Readers' comments:  "From what I have read we are / were, apparently, 'running' PCR tests at 45 cycles. Anything over 33 is too high and likely to result in a significant number of false positives. Apparently 'the worst lab' was returning a positive rate of 20%(!)"


Antibody Tests

YOUTUBE:  Coronavirus: Is This How They Plan to Steal and Sell Your DNA?  (02 June 2020)  [Transcript]

"Antigen tests, which involve taking a swab from the nose or throat, simply show if someone actually has the coronavirus in their body. Antibody tests involve taking a blood sample and looking to see if the body contains antibodies which respond to the virus. If you have antibodies in your blood then you have had and have overcome the coronavirus. The blood sample will be sent off to a laboratory to be tested. This will be a much bigger testing programme than the antigen testing. Governments are planning to do millions of antibody tests on their populations. And the key words here are 'blood sample'..."


Conflating Flu and Covid

YOUTUBE:  Combined Report? Why? 🤔  (11 October 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "When deaths were no longer scary enough, they switched to 'cases'. When 'cases' were no longer scary enough, they switched to 'tests'. When tests become no longer scary enough, they will switch to 'test turn-around time'. And when ALL of that is no longer scary enough, they're getting ready to switch to combined flu and fake-flu figures. it's called fraud"  /  "They started doing this in Switzerland too. My husband is Swiss and told me about it a couple of weeks ago. We thought oh it'll come to the UK soon then, and here it is"  /  "Couldn't be more obvious they're scamming the country and most people still can't see it" /  "This is beyond stupid now, if people can't see the wood for the trees after this..."  /  "Wake up everyone... the water's beginning to boil"


Contact Tracing / Test and Trace

BITCHUTE:  The Rising Technocracy  (10 December 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "This whole scam needs to be overthrown now before it can continue to get worse"  /  "Remember... Corona is the common cold, not the flu"  /  "Dave, you might not think you are doing much but you are a great encouragement to me when I hear your level-headed talk on resistance to the brainwashing all around us, it really does help to know that others feel the same"  /  "The WHO is publishing articles about changing our economy and our culture. Can we stop pretending they are a medical organization now? They are full-on Communist propaganda"  /  "Those who wear the face diaper will take the vaccine. Those who take the vaccine will take the mark"

Download Coronavirus Tracing App to Protect Your Families, Public Told  (24 September 2020)

"However, one in three people told to isolate by the app will have been given a 'false positive', in which it will have wrongly thought that they had been within two metres of an infectious person for 15 minutes. This is because of its reliance on Bluetooth signals, which can be affected by nearby objects ... The officials now says that the app's main benefit could be to prompt people to stick to social distancing and hygiene rules ... who otherwise would download an app whose principal feature was that it might order you to stay at home for two weeks?"

The Government's National Panic Service is Being Used to Keep Us in A Condition of Perpetual Alarm About Coronavirus  (02 August 2020)

"The most common symptom of Covid-19 is that you feel just fine. A huge number of those now being absurdly listed as 'infected' with this bogeyman disease are perfectly healthy. If the trained hunters of the Government's National Panic Service had not tracked them down, most of them would never have known they were supposed to be ill. Why do we take this seriously? It is a fact, not a 'conspiracy theory', that the power of the state is now being used to keep us in a condition of perpetual alarm ... the more scared we are, the more we obey..."

WHO Says Coronavirus Crisis 'Worsening', Prescribes 'Active Surveillance' of Infected Populations  (09 June 2020)

The WHO throwing a hissy fit and attempting a bit of desperate stalking as its red-pilled Ex finally walks away:

"A clearly frustrated WHO ... 'We urge active: (a) surveillance to ensure the virus does not rebound, (b) finding, isolating, testing & caring for every case, (c) tracing & quarantining every contact'..."

YOUTUBE:  Contact Tracing Comes to the UK  (09 June 2020)

"Examining how the UK is becoming the pilot case for the roll-out of contact tracing across the western world."  /  Viewers' comments:  "This is related to the aims of extinction rebellion. Test and trace will make life unbearable"  /  "Leave your phones at home, people. Stop participating in their games"  /  "Get rid of your 'smart' phone. The word 'smart' now carries an Orwellian meaning like Freedom is Slavery"  /  "Globalism is the model. A long term plan in the form of Agenda 21 involving UN, WHO, WEF, DAVOS, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations, and all the spin offs"

The Real Intent of Contact Tracing  (04 June 2020)

"Here is a video from the May 30, 2020 Minnesota state press conference ... 'As we've begun making arrests we have begun analyzing the data of who we've arrested and begun actually doing what you would as almost very similar to our COVID. It's contact tracing of who are they associated with' ... COVID-19 contact tracing was never about the coronavirus..."

YOUTUBE:  Where Did Corona Go?  (04 June 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "Self isolate if a tracer tells you. Don't meet friends or you will be punished. Stand meekly in line. Stand on the circle you are told to. British freedom 2020"  /  "To paraphrase Winston Churchill: never in the history of Britain has so much been taken from so many by so few"  /  "This is a mere fraction of what we are facing if we don't stand up and push back"  /  "The NHS are beginning to oppress the public. If there was a virus, it's long gone"  /  "Test and trace is totally unacceptable totalitarian control and a portent of things to come"  /  "Control. We must not comply"  /  "This virus is not the bubonic plague and with a 99% recovery rate, unless you have underlying health problems ... I don't see why people are so fearful"  /  "Is every flu season going to be given a sinister name again in the future just to whittle away our rights. Corona phobia may never go away for some of the population and its a brilliant subversive tool for the government to fall back on when necessary"  /  "Covid-1984"  /  "Test and trace, pure lunacy ... The public will often bend but not break ... wake up people"  /  "Second wave in September/October, you mean when it gets colder. Isn't that the flu?"  /  "Stay home. Submit. Obey. Don't question your government"  /  "So you would get endless calls to self-isolate cos some[one] keeps dobbing you in? So you could get contacted over and over again - that won't get you sacked would it?"  /  "At least the happy clappers haven't been out tonight. Some small mercy"

Stop the Covid-19 Trace Act  (01 June 2020)

"The TRACE Act (H.R.6666) ... is the beginning of a major effort to enforce mandatory vaccinations, and it means government may come to your home and demand that you take a COVID-19 tests. And this could mean that government will make sure you stay at home. What is not clear is how this would be enforced. And that should give you chills ... A Texas-based technology company called MTX Group is leading the way to create Contact Tracing apps to be used by health officials, airports, schools, and government officials to track our movements and our interactions with others. Just as the name of the bill says, Testing, Researching and Contacting Everyone. It is the destruction of personal freedom and privacy rights, all in the name of a virus panic that has proven to be less dangerous than first thought. And the forces behind it intend to keep it going as long as they can in a blatant power grab that affects every part of our lives..."

YOUTUBE:  Snitches, Sneaks and Quislings are Killing Families, Communities and Society  (31 May 2020)

"[H]ow governments are encouraging people to tell tales on their friends and neighbours, and the damage this is doing to relationships and trust"  /  Viewers' comments:  "Not an old man Sitting in a Chair. It's a wise brain, in an old suit, resting in a chair"  /  "How I appreciate you, Dr Coleman. Thank you for your brilliant mind, and your measured reason"  /  "You're a very wise, intelligent gentleman with a calm soothing voice ... You speak and share the truth and I thank you, Sir"  /  "God bless you Dr. Coleman"  /  "Smartphones telling tales on your activity"  /  "Instead of a bell for leprosy now we have the alert bell from your mobile phone"  /  "This is getting beyond insane"  /  "The pandemic madness manifests most strongly in the minds of those who gobble down several daily doses of MSM news. Those who stay away from the TV are getting on with their lives"  /  "I am predicting the next excuse for this prolonged and extended house arrest will be that not enough people have been tested yet"  /  "With the upcoming economic collapse, there will be millions of willing cowards and capitulators who will sell their souls to this dark agenda. We must fight hard to spread truth"

Government Refuses to Say How Many People Have Been Contact Traced So Far After Error-Strewn Launch  (31 May 2020)

"A health chief has ... warned at least 10% of Britons will ignore requests to self-isolate when contacted by NHS Covid tracers, due to lockdown fatigue or having to keep working ... The Director of the Field Epidemiology Service [Professor Isabel Oliver ] at Public Health England [said] that though most people are willing to comply, a minority will disobey instructions ... Boris Johnson's alleged ex-mistress [said] she would not use the app ... The technology expert said: 'The Government can say they're doing the best to keep it secure, there's just no guarantee it's 100% secure or the data is going to be kept secure, encrypted and used only for this, I don't think people should give away their freedoms' ... One worker manning the phones ... warned there was 'nothing we can do' about infected Brits who refuse to hand over the names and telephone numbers of people they came into close contact with. The former shop assistant, who asked not to be named, said she was being paid £75 a day - regardless if she made any calls..."

Track and Trace, and the Difference Between Covid-19 and 'From/With Coronavirus'  (29 May 2020)

"Track and trace depends upon a person first informing on himself ... For the innocents whose names are passed to the authorities, there is an expectation, after they have been contacted ... to log on to an NHS website to communicate with the 'test and trace' service ... there will be individuals who submit themselves, and people they have encountered in the course of their daily life, into a world of inconvenience when there really hasn't been any need to to do it. And so, for the benefit of people who might be tempted to trigger a case of track and trace, here follows an explanation ... of the difference between Covid-19 and 'from/with coronavirus' to help make sure that the track and trace scheme is only involved in monitoring genuine cases of the disease..."

YOUTUBE:  A Woman Gets Her Contact Tracer's Certificates and Tells All  (28 May 2020)

"So, who did you come in contact with? Let's look at your phone and social media and jog your memory... Your family needs to be quarantined for 14 days and maybe longer, everyone sitting in the same [carriage] on the train as you,
people you work with, people in the restaurant you were in ... you could get quarantined again and again and again.  Even though you're healthy and never sick you will not be allowed to leave your house. What is the purpose of Contact Tracing?..."

YOUTUBE:  NHS Track and Trace App - A New Level of Health Anxiety  (05 May 2020)

Viewers' comments:  "We need to get out into the fresh air, get away from the TV and MSM"  /  "When you make a society fearful, then you can control them. Simple principle really" /  "Not to mention everyone sitting near the person whose phone starts pinging"  /  This is a good excuse to implement things they knew people would under normal circumstances not accept"  /  "Very sinister"  /  "What happens if you get an alert every week or so, does that mean I will have to self-isolate every time? Which means I'll be on lockdown indefinitely?"  /  "It is crazy how easily manipulated people are, and frightening"  /  "The whole operating model around this app has nothing to do with protecting people from the virus. This is all about fear and control. I won't be participating"  /  "Smartphones are making us dumb people. We have loads of information but no knowledge"  /  "Just like waiting for that 'knock on the door'"  /  "I want an app on my phone that tells me when some idiot has the NHS app on their phone so I can stay away from them"  /  "George Orwell's 1984 on steroids"  /  "People need to choose not to be fearful because fear lowers your immune system and makes you vulnerable to viruses"  /  "First step to Chinese style social credit score. I'm not downloading. And if any of the Stasi phone me, I will tell the snitches they have the wrong number"  /  "The app is not intended to help anyone. It is designed to create agitation, anxiety, fear, and chaos"  /  "Get them used to the app. Increase the fear. The perfect recipe for the introduction of the vaccine which will stop the pinging"

Assault on Privacy: UK Contact Tracing App Data To Be Stored on Government Servers  (30 April 2020)

"The British government has announced that it will adopt a centralised approach to its planned contact tracing app, meaning that user data will be stored in government servers, sparking fears that the program could infringe upon privacy rights ... Last month, a group of 'responsible technologists' in the UK wrote to the head of NHSX and to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, warning that 'location and contact tracking technology could be used as a means of social control'..."

YOUTUBE:  Stop Calling It Contact Tracing!  (27 April 2020)

"What's in a name? Everything. Find out about the latest attempt to package the Orwellian total police state surveillance grid as something wonderful and wholesome - and why you should never, ever say 'contact tracing'..."


Quotes and Comments

Contact Tracing / Test and Trace


"Test and trace was implemented at great cost ... it is entirely pointless once a disease is endemic and pervasive. Mass-scaled PCR testing was rolled-out, spinning 45 cycles when it is openly accepted that anything over 33 is highly likely to produce a false positive by detecting old 'dead' Covid. As a result of this thousands of healthy people were forced into 14 days self-isolation for no good reason whatsoever" [reader's comment at source].

"The Government's contact-tracing app has been hailed by its creators as instrumental in helping the country 'return to normality and beating coronavirus', but has yet to be released. It will only run on smartphones that run Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems, meaning non-smart mobile phones, Windows and old BlackBerry handsets will not support it. Devices need to be new enough to support Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)4 technology, to identify passing phones also running the app, and run relatively recent software. This is iOS11 or above for iPhones, or Android8 (Oreo) or above for Android phones"
[I newspaper, 12 June 2020].

"Contact Tracing is never about controlling the spread of the virus. It's all part of a state surveillance apparatus implemented by the government to monitor, limit and catch unsuspecting people into naming and shaming them. Look no further than Shenzhen and its Special Economic Zone in which their surveillance mechanism are in effect today by which people are ranked using social credit scores which can allow and deny them access to services ... the government ... is harvesting our personal information ... stay away from those who seek to control our lives by contact tracing ... have no part in any contact tracing or any government surveillance programs"
[viewer's comment at source].

The PCR Test

"[W]ith PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody ... if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of PCR ... the measurement ... is not exact at all ... the results are inferred, in a sense ... [the PCR test is] just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick"
[Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

"If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR"
[Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

"I do want to emphasize that I'm in the business of testing for COVID. I do want to emphasize that positive test results do not, underlined in neon, mean a clinical infection. It's simply driving public hysteria and all testing should stop. Unless you're presenting to the hospital with some respiratory problem"
[Dr. Roger Hodkinson, MA, MB, FRCPC, FCAP, CEO, Medical Specialist in Pathology/Virology, Medical Director of Western Medical Assessments, source].

"I've been involved in PCR testing for some considerable time mainly for ethnicity, forensic, cancer research and paternity testing using both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. The amplification of DNA by PCR thermal cycling is a superb methodology which was discovered by Kary Banks Mullis some years ago and works very well for DNA amplification. It was never intended for use as a mass assay tool for single stranded positive sense RNA amplifications as found in most viruses. The extra stage of using reverse transcriptase to convert the viral RNA to DNA for PCR amplification is fraught with laboratory and sampling errors, not to mention the numerous gaucheries of inexperienced and untrained people recruited for the task"
[viewer's comment at source].

"These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection"
[TIB Molbiol, quoted at source].

The Inaccuracy of the PCR Tests


"This test is monstrously unsuitable for detecting who has live virus in their airway" [Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"There are few among our political elite and the supporting Senior Civil Service who have STEM degrees and the consequence of this narrow pool is a failure to understand basic concepts, e.g. they believe 'the science is settled' when it comes to climate change, and that they're 'following the science' regarding COVID-19. What they fail to appreciate is that science is rarely settled. By its nature, it is about investigating and challenging assumptions, collecting and evaluating evidence to test hypotheses, and seeking to avoid bias and misrepresentation of results. The current narrative regarding testing and 'cases' is a classic example of this lack of numeracy and statistical knowledge. If you test more you are likely to find more occurrences and they may be actual positives or false positives"

"It is also vital that we review the accuracy of the [PCR] tests currently being deployed. Our studies show that many Covid tests are picking up virus traces long after an infection has gone. An overly simplistic testing approach has, therefore, resulted in large numbers of people being incorrectly labelled as a threat to public health"
[Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr. Tom Jefferson, source].

"[The problem] lies in the belief that there are actually a significant number of 'unsystematic infected' who can spread the virus. The reality is, they actually are very rare. Just like any flu, German studies found, an infection occurs after a longer term close contact with symptomatic (sick) individuals. And of course, even if one does contract 'The virus', then there is a question of if one will notice at all - perhaps having contracted it earlier and defeated it, gaining antibodies or having prior (yes prior) immunity in specific T cells, thanks to years of exposure to the common cold. The truth is, we are all told to panic and put on useless masks and to agree to a loss of liberty in an attempt to stop something that cannot be controlled and will go through its normal course and trajectory as a virus does. Most places have already gone over the curve swell in deaths and now have, per capita, insignificant numbers. 'Case' numbers rise, but this is meaningless as the very sensitive PCR tests only show the presence of bits of viral DNA not an actual virus present. A person could have had the virus, unknowingly, weeks or months before or indeed a closely similar common cold type coronavirus, and then test 'positive'. It should be noted that very few, if any, who test positive require any sort of medical attention"

"PCR primer design searches (called a query) for similarities between the known DNA sequence of one organism with that of another organism DNA sequence, also called the query sequence. Similarities between DNA sequences are meaningless and thereby fraught with positive results when PCR is used for the diagnosis of a disease ... Imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification ... just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching only requiring similarities. Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations. Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test"
[reader's comment at source].

"A positive PCR test does not tell doctors whether the person is currently ill or will become ill in the future, whether they are infectious or will become infectious, whether they are recovered or recovering from COVID, or whether that PCR test identified a viral fragment from another coronavirus infection in the past"

"Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms ... This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens"
[CDC, quoted at source].

"[P]ositive results ... do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease"
[FDA, quoted at source].

"Considering that the DNA sequences get doubled at every cycle, even a slight variation becomes magnified and can thus alter the result, annihilating the test's reliable informative value. So how can it be that those who claim the PCR tests are highly meaningful for so-called COVID-19 diagnosis blind out the fundamental inadequacies of these tests - even if they are confronted with questions regarding their validity?"

Cycles (Ct)

"If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR"
[Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR test, source].

"For many tests the cycle threshold is set very high - the cycle threshold is the number of amplification cycles a PCR test goes through before a target pathogen is detected. A lower cycle threshold means that a higher amount of the virus was present in the sample, a higher threshold means the machine had to work harder to detect the virus in the sample indicating a lower viral load and more likely a non-infectious patient"

"PCR is a way of testing for RNA. RNA is a virus' equivalent of DNA, it is the RNA that allows the virus to replicate. For testing to work the RNA is first converted to DNA. Because you need adequate levels of DNA to detect COVID-19, the DNA present in the sample is amplified multiple times. After every cycle of amplification the sample is tested for the presence of COVID-19. The smaller the quantity of original viral RNA, the more cycles it will take for a positive result. However, there comes a point where if you repeat cycles too many times then samples without viral RNA will also show a positive result. This is one source of error that produces a false positive"

"With 1 copy/μl of a sample (Ct 35), without cough, without symptoms, one can understand why all these doctors and scientists say that a positive RT-PCR test means nothing, nothing at all in terms of medicine and clinic! Positive RT-PCR tests, without any mention of Ct or its relation to the presence or absence of symptoms, are used as is by our governments as the exclusive argument to apply and justify their policy of severity, austerity, isolation and aggression of our freedoms ... there is no medical justification for these decisions"

"Most RT-PCR tests set the Ct at 40 ... some set it at 37. 'Tests with such high thresholds (Ct) may not only detect live virus but also gene fragments, remnants of an old infection that do not represent any particular danger' ... an RT-PCT test with a Ct greater than 35 is too sensitive. 'A more reasonable threshold would be between 30 and 35'"

Contamination of PCR Tests

"PCR is a quite remarkable technique, which has unparalleled ability to find truly tiny quantities of a fragment of a genetic sequence, right down to the level of finding a single, broken fragment of a virus in a messy biological sample. There are notable limitations, well known to those who've personally used PCR in a research context. The most important one is its propensity to suffer from contamination, and the integrity of a PCR is very easily destroyed by invisible levels of contamination even in the hands of an expert, working alone and on a small handful of samples"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

False Positives

"The causes of false positives are myriad. From other viruses, to contaminant human DNA as well as cross contamination between cases and residual RNA fragments in patients who have cleared the virus"

"Government decided to call a person a 'case' if their swab sample was positive for viral RNA, which is what is measured in PCR. A person's sample can be positive if they have the virus, and so it should. They can also be positive if they've had the virus some weeks or months ago and recovered. It's faintly possible that high loads of related, but different coronaviruses, which can cause some of the common colds we get, might also react in the PCR test, though it's unclear to me if it does. But there's a final setting in which a person can be positive and that's a random process. This may have multiple causes, such as the amplification technique not being perfect and so amplifying the 'bait' sequences placed in with the sample, with the aim of marrying up with related SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA. There will be many other contributions to such positives. These are what are called false positives"
    [Dr. Mike Yeardon, source].

"[U]nless changes are made, the test is hopelessly unsuitable to the job asked of it ... Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 [community testing] since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them ... the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"[T]he science is clear: The numbers generated by these RT-PCR tests do not in the least justify frightening people who have been tested 'positive' and imposing lockdown measures that plunge countless people into poverty and despair or even drive them to suicide. And a 'positive' result may have serious consequences for the patients as well, because then all non-viral factors are excluded from the diagnosis and the patients are treated with highly toxic drugs and invasive intubations. Especially for elderly people and patients with pre-existing conditions such a treatment can be fatal ... Without doubt eventual excess mortality rates are caused by the therapy and by the lockdown measures, while the 'COVID-19' death statistics comprise also patients who died of a variety of diseases, redefined as COVID-19 only because of a 'positive' test result whose value could not be more doubtful"

"[O]nly 5% of households have more than 1 person testing positive for COVID-19, This figure of 'household clustering' used to be much higher during the height of the epidemic. This suggests either that COVID-19 is no longer [September 2020] very contagious (such that in 95% of households where someone has COVID-19, no-one else is detected as having the disease) or the number of COVID-19 cases is being over-stated by false positive results"

"A false positive pseudo-epidemic is a well described phenomenon in the medical literature which results in an exponential rise in diagnosed cases and deaths but no excess deaths. PCR testing is renowned for it, and the 'second wave' of Swine Flu in 2009 was entirely a false positive pseudo-epidemic, only stopped by stopping the PCR testing [and] replacing it with antigen testing. SAGE have been focused on the constant low false positive rate of the testing equipment but the false positive rate of the whole testing process is variable and can rise. Evidence of one laboratory with a low operational false positive rate gives no indication of what the operational false positive rate is in a different laboratory or at a different point in time"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al, source].

"There is an NHS staffing crisis caused by false positive test results. NHS including ambulance staff and care home staff are all being tested and made to isolate merely on the basis of a single positive test even when asymptomatic, when the evidence on spread from asymptomatic subjects is equivocal at best. This is causing a staffing crisis in the NHS which will undoubtedly result in patients dying"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al, source].

Mass Testing Using PCR Tests

"[M]ass testing brings with it, when using PCR as the method, a severe risk of what we call a 'PCR false pseudo-epidemic.'  This could never happen if were not using PCR mass testing of the mostly well. So, for whatever reason and against all historical precedent and immunological reasoning, a major initiative was laughed with the goal of reaching 500,000 tests a day by year's end"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

The Experience of the PCR Tests

"I had a test for COVID 19 and the first result was positive. I was upset, then I was invited for the second and third tests. The second one showed that it is not COVID 19 but one of the other types of coronavirus. Then I had a third one for antibodies and three blood tests - they showed that I had no COVID 19, but I have all the other coronavirus types. The Doctor who was managing the test and laboratory said to me that 99% of tested patients have all varieties of coronaviruses and antibodies. And they all show on the first test as COVID infected (but it is not COVID 19). So it is widely assumed that the first test in many countries diagnoses as COVID 19 when it is not" [source].

"Out of the 19 individuals who tested positive, one had been PCR positive three months earlier and was also antibody positive. The immune system works to neutralise the virus and prevent further infection. The infectious stage lasts about a week. Inactivated RNA, however, degrades slowly: it can be detected weeks after infectiousness has gone. In one case, RT-PCR continued to pick up fragments of RNA until the 63rd day after symptom onset. The duration of faecal shedding of viral RNA in one patient was up to 47 days from symptom onset. PCR detection of viruses is helpful so long as its limitations are understood; while it detects RNA in minute quantities, caution needs to be applied to the results as it often does not detect the infectious virus. The detection problem is ubiquitous for RNA viruses detection. SARS-Cov, MERS, Influenza, Ebola, and Zika viral RNA can also be detected long after the disappearance of the virus. Why does it matter? Because when it comes to Covid-19, insufficient attention has been paid to how PCR results actually relate to disease. The harms of false-positive results can be substantial: operations can be delayed or cancelled; patients are kept in hospital, just in case; further testing is required; in some cases, it drives local lockdowns ... mass testing might cause more harm than good if the nuances of test threshold are not understood"
[Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr. Tom Jefferson, source].

"In the NYT, experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada that mention [Cts]. Conclusion? 'Up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus'. The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, analyzed the results of its July tests at the request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40. 'With a Ct threshold of 35, approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,' said the NYT.  'And about 70% would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30!'  In Massachusetts, between 85 and 90% of people who tested positive in July with a Ct of 40 would have been considered negative with a Ct of 30, adds the NYT. And yet, all these people had to isolate themselves, with all the dramatic psychological ad economic consequences, while they were not sick and probably not contagious all"

'Cases' and 'Infections' / Symptoms

"People infected with the virus are most infectious from a day or two before symptoms appear till about five days after"

"Throughout the summer deaths dropped to the point where they were statistically insignificant. Eventually, realising that the public no longer took vuvu seriously, the Government decided to start reporting daily cases rather than daily deaths to try and return it to the public psyche. Notwithstanding the fact that a positive test result and a case are not, medically speaking, the same thing"
[reader's comment at source].

"Part of the 'project fear' that is rather too obvious, involving second waves, has been the daily count of 'cases'. It's important to understand that, according to the infectious disease specialists I've spoken to, the word 'case' has to mean more than merely the presence of some foreign organism. It must present signs (things medics notice) and symptoms (things you notice). And in most so-called cases, those testing positive had no signs or symptoms of illness at all. There was much talk of asymptomatic spreading, and as a biologist this surprised me. In almost every case, a person is symptomatic because they have a high viral load and either it is attacking their body or their immune system is fighting it, generally a mix. I don't doubt there have been some cases of asymptomatic transmission, but I'm confident it's not important"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"Pillar 2 [community PCR testing] testing has been ongoing since May but it's only in recent weeks that it has reached several hundreds of thousands of tests per day. The effect of the day by day climb in the number of people that are being described as 'cases' cannot be overstated. I know it is inducing fear, anxiety and concern for the possibility of new and unjustified restrictions, including lockdowns. I have no idea what Mr Hancock's motivations are. But he has and continues to use the hugely inflated output from a fatally flawed Pillar 2 test and appears often on media, gravely intoning the need for additional interventions (none of which, I repeat, are proven to be effective)"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"[A] hopelessly-performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease, but, it seems, solely to create fear. This misuse of power must cease ... the test used in Pillar 2 [community PCR testing] must be immediately withdrawn as it provides no useful information.  In the absence of vastly inflated case numbers arising from this test, the pandemic would be seen and felt to be almost over"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"An epidemic is defined as the wide spread of an infectious disease. The final letter of COVID is 'D' for disease. A disease requires symptoms. Public Health England's National COVID-19 case definition required the presence of symptoms. Somehow symptoms have become irrelevant. We are now chasing down the healthy, immune population who are being over tested. This includes those in hospital with other symptoms and for other reasons. If we tested for influenza in the same way and with the same implications, we would have to lockdown every winter"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al, source].

"A PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic looks just like a real epidemic, but isn't ... Now, in late November, we are told there are sometimes 25,000 new 'cases' daily and that several hundred daily 'COVID-19 deaths' are occurring ... A 'case' is a positive PCR test. No symptoms are involved.  A 'COVID-19 admission' to a hospital is a person testing positive by PCR before, on entry or at any time during a hospital stay, no matter the reason for the admission or the symptoms the patient is presenting.  A 'COVID-19 death' is any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test ... In the autumn, the claimed 'cases' are an artefact of a deranged testing system"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, source].

"For all relevant data items: a confirmed COVID-19 patient is any patient admitted to the trust who has recently (ie in the last 14 days) tested positive for COVID-19 following a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Patients who have been diagnosed via X-ray and assessment rather than a positive test should be counted as suspected (and not confirmed) COVID-19 patients. So patients that have a test but no diagnosis are confirmed COVID patients. Anyone with a firm clinical diagnosis but no positive test are 'suspected'"

"There is also the lingering myth of the PCR test as a reliable standard for diagnosing Covid infections. Due to the widespread abuse of PCR, which was never designed nor intended to be relied upon as a confirmatory diagnostic tool, a growing number of medical experts argue that the US, the UK, Germany and other EU nations are facing a 'casedemic' rather than a pandemic due to a pathogenic virus. Despite PCR's high rate of misdiagnosis, positive results are still being reported as Covid cases"

PCR Tests and C19 Vaccines

"[D]ue to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used.  This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19.  On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"The only reason one might even consider mass testing of those without symptoms is if you were convinced that those without symptoms were significant sources of transmission. This has always seemed to me to a very tenuous assumption. Specifically, respiratory viruses are spread by droplets of secretions and generally the expulsion of these is linked to the symptoms of infection - coughing in particular. Humans ... recognise threats to health by close observation of the health status of others. It works well. We're familiar with avoiding those with flu-like symptoms in winter and behaving responsibly by staying away from work and vulnerable people when we are symptomatic. The burden of proof rests with those claiming something very different in the case of SARS-CoV-2 to show conclusively that asymptomatic people are indeed major sources of transmission. I don't think that case has at all been made"
[Dr Mike Yeadon, source].

Correct Medical Procedure

"[I]n medicine we always start from the person: we examine him/her, we collect his/her symptoms (complaints-anamnesis) and objective clinical signs (examination) and on the basis of a clinical reflection in which scientific knowledge and experience intervene, we make diagnostic hypotheses. Only then do we prescribe the most appropriate tests, based on this clinical reflection. We constantly compare the test results with the patient's clinical condition (symptoms and signs), which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to our decisions and treatments. Today, our governments, supported by their scientific safety advice, are making us do the opposite ands the test first, followed by a clinical reflection necessarily influenced by this prior test ... we always work in this direction: from the person (symptoms, signs) to the appropriate tests, never the other way around" [source].

Lateral Flow Testing

"The only confirmatory testing carried out has shown no COVID. Army testing in Liverpool uses a different and more reliable test - the Lateral Flow Test (LFT). It has demonstrated that there is minimal COVID in the Liverpool community, the alleged hotspot. The numbers testing positive are barely above the false positive rate reported for the LFT meaning there were no real COVID cases found. In other words, the Army results confirm the fact that at least 90% of the PCR were false positives and the government is panicking on the basis of a massively exaggerated and unreliable statistic"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al, source].

Recommended Actions

"The cure, of course, as it has been in the past when PCR has replaced the pandemic itself as the menace in the land, is to stop PCR mass testing ... until we end the use of PCR mass testing, here is no chance that 'cases' willo reduce to very low levels. lateral Flow Tests must become the gold standard test for COVID with PCR only used for confirmatory diagnosis. This will minimise the number of PCR tests that need to be performed allowing testing to return to competent NHS laboratories. Without such an intervention, even if the virus stopped circulating, I believe we'll still hear of tens of thousands of 'cases' every day, and several hundred deaths"
[Dr Mike Yeadon, source].

"The following are the most important actions to be taken immediately;  (1) Stop mass testing asymptomatic individuals ... (2) Re-test a sample of hospitalised patients previously diagnosed (by PCR alone) using LFT ... (3) If PCR is to continue to be used at all, it should be at low scale ... (4) Even conducted at lower scale, it is vital that additional quality control measures for PCR testing are instituted ... (5) Hospital / NHS and care-home staff absence policies should be based primarily on LFT testing ... (6) The definition of 'an outbreak' must require subjects to have positive LFT results ... (7) Overturn the Ofcom ban on free speech in broadcast media..."
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al, source].

"(1) We must demand that the RT-PCR results be returned mentioning the Ct used because beyond Ct 30, a positive RT-PCR test means nothing;  (2) We must listen to the scientists and doctors, specialists, virologists who recommend the use of adapted Ct, lower, at 30. An alternative is to obtain the number of copies of viral RNA/μl or /ml sample;  (3) We need to go back to the patient, to the person, to his or her clinical condition (presence or absence of symptoms) and from there to judge the appropriateness of testing and the best way to interpret the result.  (4) Until there is a better rationale for PCR screening, with a known and appropriate Ct threshold, an asymptomatic person should not be tested in any way"


Summary Re: PCR Tests

"Summary of important points:

  • The RT-PCR test is a laboratory diagnostic technique that is not well suited to clinical medicine;
  • It is a binary, qualitative diagnostic technique that confirms (positive test) or not (negative test) the presence of an element in the medium being analyzed. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, the element is a fragment of the viral genome, not the virus itself;
  • In medicine, even in an epidemic or pandemic situation, it is dangerous to place tests, examinations, techniques above clinical evaluation (symptoms, signs). It is the opposite that guarantees quality medicine;
  • The main limitation (weakness) of the RT-PCR test, in the current pandemic situation, is its extreme sensitivity (false positive) if a suitable threshold of positivity (Ct) is not chosen. Today, experts recommend using a maximum Ct threshold of 30;
  • This Ct threshold must be informed with the positive RT-PCR result so that the physician knows how to interpret this positive result, especially in an asymptomatic person, in order to avoid unnecessary isolation, quarantine, psychological trauma;
  • In addition to mentioning the Ct used, laboratories must continue to ensure the specificity of their detection kits for SARS-CoV-2, taking into account its most recent mutations, and must continue to use three genes from the viral genome being studied as primers, or, if not, mention it" [source].


Wake Up, Folks...

"Firstly, the country needs to wake up to what this experiment in population control is really all about... [The country should] unlock, because:

  • more people are now dying, and in danger of dying in the months to come, from the lockdown (e.g., from other serious illnesses that are not now being treated in favour of the virus, from increased domestic abuse, etc) than are dying from Covid-19;
  • the population's immune systems are being weakened through lack of vitamin D, exercise, social contact, etc (thus leaving people more susceptible to this particular coronavirus as well as to other coronaviruses that underlie other seasonal colds and flus);
  • in every other illness, it is the sick who are quarantined, not the healthy;
  • the economy is being crashed and many, many people are losing their jobs - which will lead to depressions, suicides, etc.;
  • child abuse has increased due to the lockdown;
  • alcoholism has increased due to the lockdown;
  • home abortions are being promoted due to the lockdown - as if we don't already murder enough unborn babies;
  • DNRs are being forced on the vulnerable elderly, weak, and mentally impaired;
  • freedom of assembly and association, as well as a host of other rights and liberties from Magna Carta onwards are being trampled on.  Easily given away by us they will not be returned to us so easily...

"That list - and more - is why the lockdown (a prison term) must be quickly ended.

"Secondly, the UK Government first insisted in the lockdown/house imprisonment to (supposedly) enable the NHS to cope.  The NHS has coped.  The hastily thrown up Nightingale hospital across the country (across the world) are standing empty: the 4000-bed Nightingale hospital in London has had a maximum of nineteen (if I recollect correctly) Covid-19 patients.  The Government has now moved these initial goalposts; insisting instead on five utterly vague conditions that can be drawn out indefinitely: i.e., primarily until a certain billionaire founder of Microsoft (with a certain chief medical advisor to the UK Government and a certain Imperial College 'scientific' computer modeller in his pocket) can implement his long-held desire to impose his mandatory vaccinations and digital certificates on the world's population.

"Thirdly, the bigger picture is the global implementation of Agenda 21/2030 ... A21's Sustainable Development Goals are directly relevant to our current situation because the social/travel/other limits now being placed on the world's population are the seeds of the UN's A21 programme for its planned one world government.  And in its turn, A21 is a precursor or a shadow of the trib and will be preparing the world for antichrist's 15 minutes (well, three-and-a-half-years) of fame.  How long it will take for the post-lockdown 'New Normal' to morph into Agenda 21, and how long the world will be subjected to A21 before the trib starts, I have no idea and I think I'd rather not know for now.  However, the good news [is that the Lord will] return to put an end to all these shenanigans, and set up His eternal Kingdom" [Elizabeth McDonald, comments on FBC Forum, 01/06/07 May 2020].


As In the Days of Noah...

"In Noah's day, the sons of men and the sons of God mixed and produced hybrids which, by definition, were unsaveable.  Therefore, God had to destroy them, which He did in the world-wide flood.  If God had not done so, these hybrids would have continually reproduced in kind and thereby destroyed God's plan of salvation for Adam's descendants.  Scripture tells us that the last days will be like the days of Noah.  One of these similarities may be the creating of hybrid humans of some kind.  The Bible also warns us against taking 'The Mark of the Beast' because it will damn us to hell.  Why will it do that?  If the Mark of the Beast causes a hybridisation of mankind in some way, then, as in the Days of Noah, these hybrids will become unsaveable.  How might this modern-day hybridisation - or, if you prefer, transhumanism - come about?  Vaccinations could very easily become the means of achieving it.  There may indeed be no (or few) problems with the ingredients of any initial C19 vaccine, but that may simply be Boiling the Frog: i.e. lull the people into a false sense of security with the first few harmless doses, and then gradually start to alter the ingredients, so that any C19 vaccine will, at some stage, disrupt our humanity.  That eventual salvation-destroying vaccine may or may not be the current Pfizer one, but it could very well become so further down the line" [Elizabeth McDonald, 21 November 2020].


What is Covid-19?

"Covid-19 is supposedly a pneumonia as a complication of SARS-COV-2, but ...

  • For most people, Covid-19 is a mild illness which is never confirmed as being due to SARS-COV-2, but the perception of reality is created by official general prognosis,
  • A developed SARS-COV-2 infection could be flu, or even a bacterial infection, and Covid-19, or the pneumonia associated with it, would in fact arise as a complication due to these other causations,
  • Pneumonia or severe respiratory complications can occur from a treatment for cancer - which incriminates other pre-existing conditions in combination with their medical treatments,
  • Meanwhile, quite astonishingly, there is no acknowledgement of what might be true Covid-19, which is an infection of the lungs related to the interaction between SARS-COV/SARS-COV-2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) that is promoted in treatment by prescribed drugs.

"[T]he UK Government's reaction to Covid-19 has been way beyond anything anyone could call proportional. It has been unnecessarily, grotesquely exaggerated, and pointlessly damaging" [source].


Fear is the Little Death

"As Frank Herbert wrote in his novel, Dune, 'Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration' and collective fear is also the primary tool that governments have long used to bring potentially recalcitrant populations under control... sometimes to the point of obliteration.  Historically, that type of fear is not sudden but eats away at the heart and soul of a people one small nibble at a time until the minds of a now docile demographic willingly acquiesce to any number of outrageous edicts and restraints upon their lives and freedoms in the hope that in so doing this will ensure their personal survival.  And note always that once this induced fear has taken a firm hold the decisive instruments of draconian suppression are placed in the hands of powerful enforcement agencies who invariably career out of control and become a law unto themselves, quickly becoming too big and too powerful for even the political drones who unleashed them to restrain.

"Look about you now at the actions and verbal vomitus coming from HM Government's emergent blue uniformed SS, particularly their local Obersturmbannführers so erroneously referred to as Chief Constables. (Did anyone else notice the Home Secretary singing their praises at the daily briefing session a few days ago... with the senior Obergruppenführer by her side?)  Have no doubt about it, this is the situation extant in so many once-democratic countries throughout the Anglosphere and the Staatspolizei certainly won't give up their intoxicating new found powers easily, so think again - is it really worth the candle that you should sell your children into a future defined only by blind obedience to the Diktats of a monolithic controlling State in order to prolong  your lives by a few years?  'Action this day or never' is a cliché that has so often turned out to be a truism ...

"In conclusion, I am convinced that above all other political aberrations Selective Policing is the definitive sign of a corrupted Establishment acting with malignant intent to a hidden agenda and thus, with reference to the two preceding questions, I regret that I must leave you to mentally fill in, in private, those details which we are not permitted to mention in the public domain or face being prosecuted for a hate crime if we do... damn! How Orwellian is that?" [Reader's comment at source]. 


Coronavirus Act: What Are We Consenting To?

"In the UK, it is worth recapping what it is we are consenting to with the Coronavirus Act:

  • We consent to increased State surveillance of ourselves and our family;
  • We are happy that we could be detained, without charge, because some state official suspects, or claims they suspect, we may be infected;
  • It is fine with us that we or our loved ones can be sectioned under the Mental Health Act on the recommendation of a single doctor and neither we nor they need to have the protection of a second opinion we are locked up;
  • We accept that the state can retain our biometric data and fingerprints for an extended period;
  • We consent that jury trials are a bit of an anachronism and Judges can hear more evidence by video or even audio link;
  • We think it's fine that the evidence required, and processes undertaken, to determine and record our or our loved ones' deaths can be eroded to the point where they can be registered by people with no medical or legal expertise at all;
  • We don't think the NHS needs to adhere to practice standards or bother with assessing the needs of some patients, especially older people;
  • We are also fine with the complete suspension of democracy in Britain;
  • We accept all of this based upon a unique subset of scientific opinion which, contrary t every known scientific principle, can never be questioned;
  • We agree with the MSM that people who question any aspect of the stories they tell us are dangerous because these people just don't care if their own loved ones die. Only true believers care about their families;
  • We also accept the need for the State to invest considerable resources creating counter disinformation units whose purpose is to censor anything and everything which questions our firmly held beliefs. The beliefs informed by many of the same people doing the censoring..." [source].


Bayith Articles on C19

Concerning Coronavirus Vaccines  (Dec 2020 / Jan 2021)   |   Covid-19 Vaccines: As in the Days of Noah  (Nov 2020)

A Bit of Dirt...  (Nov 2020)   |   Rules Are Rules!  (Sept 2020)   |   Why I Don't Wear A Face-Mask  (Aug 2020)

Coming Out of Lockdown - Part Two: Hugs  (May 2020)   |   Coming Out of Lockdown - Part One: Rebuilding Our Immune Systems  (May 2020)

Wake Up, Folks...  (May 2020)   |   Our Place of Safety  (April 2020)




"He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in Him will I trust.
Surely He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust: His truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday ...
He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways ...
he shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble ... and show him my salvation"
(Psalm 91)




We recommend the articles, videos and books/DVDs etc we have included on this page, but please note that we would not necessarily agree with every single word contained therein; neither can we necessarily vouch for the websites or periodicals from which these articles are taken, or any other articles or materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.  Likewise, our recommendation here of specific websites/pages does not necessarily imply that we endorse every aspect of that group or ministry.

© Elizabeth McDonald