One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life (Psalm 27:4)                 Bayith Ministries

Bayith Home  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues  |  Covid-19 Home Page

Covid-19
SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2  /  SARS-CoV-2 Plus ACE2
aka: The Chinese Wuhan Coronavirus or WuFlu

C19 Vaccines
Quotes, Comments, Questions

C19 Vaccines: Articles and Videos   |   C19 Vaccines: Deaths and ADRs: Articles and Videos

C19 Vaccines: Deaths and ADRs: Quotes and Comments

Coronavirus Vaccines   |   Mandatory Vaccinations: Coercion / Informed Consent   |   mRNA/DNA Vaccines

Pfizer/BioNTech (mRNA)   |   Oxford/AstraZeneca (Viral-Vector)   |   Vaccine Trials   |   Short Duration of Study

Known Risks  |  Allergies and Anaphylactoid Reactions  |  Adverse Drug Reactions and Side Effects  |  mRNA Vaccines ADRs

Hypocrisy: From or With the Vaccine?   |   Testing on Humans is Unethical   |   C19 Vaccine Risks for the Elderly

C19 Vaccine --> The Wild Virus   |   C19 Vaccine --> Immunity/Transmission   |   C19 Vaccines and Fertility

C19 Virus, Vaccine, Colds, Flu, Flu Jab   |   C19 Vaccines and PCR Tests   |   Ingredients   |   Moral/Ethical Problems

The Precautionary Principle   |   Big Pharma   |   Indemnity   |   Bill Gates   |   Digital Implants

God-Given (aka Natural) Immunity   |   Medical Professionals   |   Fake News and Conspiracy Theories   |   Revelation 13 and 14

Scriptures   |   FDA: Draft List of C19 Vaccines' Possible Side Effects   |   Deaths in Care Homes Post-Vaccination

What is Covid-19?   |   Coronavirus Act: What Are We Consenting To?   |   Bayith Articles on C19   |   Nutrition / Vitamins / Minerals

The Hydroxychloroquine Debate   |   See also: PCR Tests   |   Covid-19 Home Page   |   A-Z of Covid19

Great Reset / Agenda 21/2030   |   Deep Ecology and Population Control   |   Scriptures to Strengthen Us

Political Cultural and Social Issues

COVID Survival Rate:
0-19yrs = 99.997%,   20-49yrs = 99.98%,   50-69yrs = 99.5%,   70+yrs = 94.6%
[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA].

The COVID-19 mRNA Gene Therapy 'Vaccine'
"At bare minimum, do more research before you make your decision.
The simple truth is you don't need it, so it's an unnecessary risk"
[source].

"And no, it's not the mark of an anti-vaxxer (I am not) to be deeply concerned about this;
it is just the mark of having one's critical faculties in working order
and of caring about what is being done to people -
it's called Loving Your Neighbour as Yourself"

 
[source].

"Instant imposition of a [statist] totalitarian system. Individuality suppressed. Families divided.
Religious, cultural, educational institutions closed down. Work, movement, information regulated by the state. Life and death decided by the state.
The transformation has been so successful here because it builds upon a deeply entrenched pre-existing machinery and ideology of welfare,
in which a large proportion of the people has come to believe it has a right and need to be looked after from cradle to grave by the government.
All they required was a pretext, an excuse -- no matter how flimsy -- and completely by coincidence the CCP flu virus arrived at the perfect moment..."

[comment at source].

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits"
"Prove all things: hold fast that which is good"
(1 John 4:1a; 1 Thessalonians 5:21)

"For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind"
(2 Timothy 1:7)

YOUTUBE:
Peace ~ Be Still ~ Lay All Your Worries Down
"Be still, O my soul, for our God is in control"

 

 

Coronavirus Vaccines

General Quotes, Comments, Questions


"[W]hen determining that a virus is so deadly as to justify a rushed rollout of a vaccine intended for use by an entire population, one must consider what is meant by 'deadly'.  We must consider the proportion of the general public who are likely to die, or to suffer serious illness from the effect of that virus"
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"I would say, forget about the vaccine thing. You don't need vaccines for seasonal, viral respiratory infections ... These viruses mutate extraordinarily quickly and they're mutating all the time. Why would you introduce vaccines into that mix when we've been living with these things for a long, long time, and our immune systems have been co-adapting to these viruses continuously? ... It's dangerous and it's reckless ... The real answer is ... to look at the medicine, do an integrated science to try to understand the nature of immune vulnerability, because the people that die are the ones that are immune vulnerable ... What your immune system needs in order to respond to it ... the death rate is way more a system as to whether your population is immune prepared ... so I would move public policy in that direction and away from these money-making vaccine schemes"
[Denis Rancourt, PhD, quoted at source].


"In the early days of COVID-19, Baylor College of Medicine's Dr. Peter Hotez testified before Congress about the perils of rushing the development of a vaccine against it, mentioning the unique safety issues posed by this type of vaccine seen by scientists half a century ago when they were working with a vaccine against RSV. During those trials, not only did the vaccines fail to prevent infections, but 80% of the children who were infected needed to be hospitalized and two who were challenged with RSV died"
[source].


"There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic ... You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease.  You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects.  This much I know after 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry"
[Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"Every vaccination is a game of Russian roulette. For safer vaccines there may be 10,000 or even 100,000 chambers in the syringe-shaped revolver but there is always that one live bullet. For other less safe vaccines such as Gardasil, MMR and DpT the odds for the single bullet drop dramatically. As in the case of Merck's Gardasil the results can be catastrophic ... And so far, the future prospects of a truly safe Covid-19 vaccine appear to be far off into the distant horizon if ever"
[source].


"The Covid-19 death rate without a vaccine is lower than the flu rate with a vaccine"
[source].


"Do we really need to vaccinate over 7,000,000,000 people against a virus that has a recovery rate of 99.9+%? It doesn't make any sense as a medical solution. It only makes sense from the point of view of someone who wants to change the world completely"
[viewer's comment at source].


Re: the British Medical Journal: 
"Thank heavens some media are standing up and saying 'Hang on a minute!' In the UK the Government have prevented the mainstream news from reporting anything that criticises Government policy. This is more akin to a third world dictatorship. In parliament MPs have been side lined from democracy and Government denies them access to the data"
[reader's comment at source].


"Ironically, the data we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate, considering the lethality of COVID-19 is lower than the flu for those under the age of 60. If you're under the age of 40, your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01%, meaning you have a 99.99% chance of surviving the infection. And you could improve that to 99.999% if you're metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete. So, really, what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine? As mentioned, the vaccine aren't even designed to prevent infection, only reduce the severity of symptoms. Meanwhile, they could potentially make you sicker once you're exposed to the virus. That seems like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit"
[source].



Mandatory Vaccines: Coercion and Informed Consent


"One thought piece suggests that anyone who refuses vaccination should be subject to indefinite house arrest
(Mello, et al, 2020). In some countries, there is talk of 'no jab, no job'. There have even been job adverts for openings in NHS Wales for people to 'oversee the vaccination of the entire population.'  Any such proposals are not only completely unnecessary but if done using any kind of coercion at all, illegal. I would completely understand and would consider accepting early use of a vaccine only if done with fully informed consent ... Other proposals have, to me, the whiff of evil about them and I will oppose them as vigorously as I have followed the pandemic so far" [Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"They need to seek for informed consent for care home folk, may of whom will have relatives with Power of Attorney. The UK government is pursuing a very bad policy ... why would anyone agree to vaccination without full information and the clinical trial data published in peer reviewed journals?"
[reader's comment at source].


"[E]very single person now getting these [Pfizer/BioNTech] jabs is effectively an unwitting test subject in the largest medical experiment ever carried out, having been asked to give their consent to receive a product injected into their bodies without being properly informed as to the status of the product" [source].


"The problem with the Government's strategy is that they are rolling out a vaccination programme in a blanket approach that does not allow members of the public to make a properly informed decision based on evaluating their own risk from catching Covid. A clinician should advise a patient to undergo treatment only when he or she has been informed of all the pros and cons, so that [the] clinician has the patient's informed consent. This consent can be obtained only when the relevant risks have been presented in a non-biased way without frightening the patient"
[source].


"[W]hether the vaccine should or should not be taken ... is a personal matter, and it is up to everyone to make their own choice. [This author does not question] any individual's decision, It should not, however, be within the State's domain to arbitrate upon people's decisions. Nor should the need for a privately thought-through individual choice be compromised by unnecessary social pressures to conform to mainstream thinking ... taking the vaccine is being afforded by a secular society the status of a religious duty whereby not to comply is a heretical act showing that one does not love one's neighbour"
[source].

 

mRNA/DNA Vaccines


"Gene-based vaccines:  In these cases, the viral gene is delivered to the cell either as DNA inserted into a plasmid or as mRNA that is directly translated into protein following cell uptake.  A great potential danger of DNA-based vaccines is the integration of plasmid DNA into the cell genome.  Insertional mutagenesis occurs rarely but can become a realistic danger when the number of events is very large, i.e. as in mass vaccination of a population.  If insertion occurs in cells of the reproductive system, the altered genetic information will be transmitted from mother to child.  Other dangers of DNA vaccines are production of anti-DNA antibodies and autoimmune reactions.  Safety concerns linked to mRNA vaccines included systemic inflammation and potential toxic effects."
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020), pp.110-111].


"A further immense danger looms that applies equally to mRNA-based coronavirus vaccines. At some time during or after production of the viral spike, waste products of the protein must be expected to become exposed on the surface of targeted cells. The majority of healthy individuals have killer lymphoctytes that recognise these viral products. It is inevitable that autoimmune attacks will be mounted against the cells. Where, when, and with which effects this might occur is entirely unknown. But the prospects are simply terrifying" 
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020), p.111].


"Yet, hundreds of volunteers who were never informed of these unavoidable risks have already received injections of DNA and mRNA vaccines encoding the spike protein of the virus, and many more are soon to follow.  No gene-based vaccine has even received approval for human used, and the present coronavirus vaccines have not undergone preclinical testing as normally required by international regulations ... Laws and safety regulations have been bypassed in a manner that would, under normal circumstances, never be possible"
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020, pp.111-112].


"Among [C19 vaccine] risks is the possibility of the vaccine's mRNA contributing to mutogenesis in reproductive cells that may be inherited later by children"
[source].


"Emer Cooke, the new head of the European Medicines Agency, has said [that] tracking the safety of Covid vaccines, especially those relying on novel technologies such as mRNA, would be one of the biggest challenges once shots are rolled out widely"
[source].


"The world population is a vast group of guinea pigs. past efforts to introduce RNA tech have failed because serious autoimmune reactions have occurred. The body basically attacks itself"
[source].


"So, really, what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine? These mRNA vaccines aren't even designed to prevent infection, only reduce the severity of symptoms. meanwhile, they could potentially make you sicker once you're exposed to the virus, and/or cause persistent serious side effects ... While I won't tell anyone what to do, I would urge you to take the time to review the science and weigh the potential risks and benefits based on your individual situation before you make a decision that you may regret for the rest of your life, which can actually be shortened with this vaccine" [source].

 

Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 (mRNA) Vaccine

"Pfizer's mRNA vaccines use a novel vaccine technology never before used on human subjects" [source].
 

"Mechanism of action:  The nucleoside-modified messenger RNA in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is formulated in lipid nanoparticles, which enable delivery of the RNA into host cells to allow expression of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen.  The vaccine elicits both neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses to the spike (S) antigen, which may contribute to protection against COVID-19 disease" [Reg 174 Information For UK Healthcare Professionals, source].

Please Note in the above quote:  the vaccine only "MAY" "CONTRIBUTE" to protection against "Covid-19 DISEASE" (C19 being the illness the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus can develop into amongst those people already immune-compromised in some way).

It does NOT state it will DEFINITELY provide FULL PROTECTION (i.e., without the addition of other immune-enhancing agents) against COVID-19 disease; neither does it say it will prevent contraction of the CORONAVIRUS (SARS-CoV-2).   
 

"The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG).  70% of people develop antibodies against this substance - this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination" [Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"The vaccine adverse events that were seen in the Pfizer study might indicate pathogenic priming, particularly given the fact that more serious adverse events were seen when people got the second dose"
[source].


"UK approved the Pfizer Biontech vaccine but I cannot find the trial data. Is it available?  /  "MHRA have approved it without any peer reviewed publications at all. I put in an FOI for the submitted data and was refused under clauses 41 & 43: not in the public interest and commercial[ly] sensitive!! I shall not be rushing for a jab anytime near the next century!"
[readers' comments at source].


"The 95% effectiveness claim is relative, not absolute, and refers to the number of people that came back reporting symptoms and were subsequently positive PCR, so asymptomatic cases would have been completely ignored, unless there had been mass PCR testing of all subjects at the end, which I'm not aware of" [reader's comment at source].

 

Oxford/AstraZeneca AZD1222/ChAdOX1n (viral-vector) Vaccine


"Viral vectors as gene-based vaccines:  The principle here is to integrate the relevant coronavirus gene into the gene of a carrier virus (e.g. adenovirus) that infects our cells. Replication-defective vectors are unable to amplify their genome and will deliver just one copy of the vaccine gene into the cells. To bolster effectiveness, attempts have been made to create replication-competent vaccines. This was undertaken with the Ebola vaccine rVSV-ZEBOV.  However, viral multiplication caused severe side effects in at least 20% of the vaccinated, including rash, vasculitis, dermatitis and arthralgia"
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020), pp.110].


"Virus-vectored and genetically engineered vaccines could undergo recombination or hybridisation with unpredictable outcomes, while vaccines produced with cell cultures are often contaminated with naked nucleic acids, genomic fragments, retroviruses and other foreign materials that carry uncertain but potentially serious hazards
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"The Oxford trial was so rushed that it couldn't even get the dosages right. A bad vaccine - equivalently with with a bad test [PCR] for covid-19 is worse than no vaccine at all"
[reader's comment at source].


"With reference to caution, safety and open access to all the data, the biopharmaceutical vaccine developing companies should provide information regarding the problems they have encountered with the type of vaccine currently developed for COVID19 which they studied in previous trials. For example, the Oxford team addressed the concern that if people already have immunity to the human adenovirus, the bioengineered human adenovirus vaccine is less likely to be clinically effective, because the vaccine's adenovirus will be neutralised by the body's immune system before it can infect cells and instruct body cells to produce the spike protein. That is why the Oxford team changed to use a monkey (simian) adenovirus as few people will be immune to that" [retired family doctor, UK, comment at source].


"Another aspect that needs to be clarified with using viral vectors, are the 'impurities', the 'contaminants' that might end up in the content of the vaccine syringe. These can be viruses ... but also bacterial and human genetic material. For example, the poliovirus vaccine was contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40)" [retired family doctor, UK, comment at source].


"The sequence of vaccine production from the chimpanzee's or a human nose swab to the syringe has several steps where problems can occur:

  • When taking a nose swab you can imagine that a swab will contain an innumerable amount of genomic material from a multitude of viruses and bacteria and body cells,
  • The cell lines used to culture the genetically modified virus are human embryonic kidney cells. These cells have been replicated in growth-media since the 1970s. How many impurities have entered these cell lines over the decades?
  • By using a Chimpanzee adenovirus is a zoonosis [disease transmitted from animal to human] iatrogenically [caused by medical treatment of a disease] introduced?
  • What impurities will accumulate in the laboratory during all the steps to genetically modify the chimpanzee adenovirus or human adenovirus as these need to be cultured in cells?
  • And eventually when producing a vaccine, a bunch of cells are incubated in many 'bioreactors' (vessels the size of 2000 L) and a solution id added which hopefully contains only the genetically modified chimp or human adenovirus. Considering the content of the chimpanzee's and human nose swab, how can the technician make sure it only contains (simian) adenovirus? There is a good chance that if the contamination virus is unknown, it won't be found, only after it shows in the population,
  • The embryonic kidney cells in the incubator will also ooze the spike protein as instructed by the modified vector virus and there are lots of other proteins in the cell brewery. Can the spike protein and the other proteins by totally separated from what goes into the syringe? The concern with injected spike protein is that could cause serious side effects like ADE or CIP,
  • This information should also be part of informed consent when the vaccine is offered?" [retired family doctor, UK, comment at source].

 

Vaccine Trials


"The trials conducted for this vaccine seem a complete sham to me. How is it possible to have a trial to test a vaccine when the volunteers on the trial are sent out to try to catch it? I imagine they were following the social distancing rules and mask wearing, which we are told repeatedly prevent the transmission and infection by the virus. So how do we know whether it was the masks or the vaccine that worked? We also have no idea about the virus exposure any of them received. They should have been isolated like the common cold unit and both the vaccine and control group exposed to a controlled amount of the virus. I wonder how many volunteers they would have had if a proper trial had been conducted. I regularly read that the coronavirus has not been isolated and so it has not been cultured in a laboratory. Who do we believe?"
[reader's comment at source].


"Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have provided the raw data for public scrutiny. Moderna says it will make the data available after the trial is completed, which will be in 2022"
[source].


"The Oxford trial was so rushed that it couldn't even get the dosages right. A bad vaccine - equivalently with with a bad test [PCR] for vcovid-19 is worse than no vaccine at all"
[reader's comment at source].


"UK approved the Pfizer Biontech vaccine but I cannot find the trial data. Is it available?  /  "MHRA have approved it without any peer reviewed publications at all. I put in an FOI for the submitted data and was refused under clauses 41 & 43: not in the public interest and commercial[ly] sensitive!! I shall not be rushing for a jab anytime near the next century!"
[readers' comments at source].


"It is very much in the public interest to have the data to examine and scrutinise ... The whole vaccine issue has been shrouded in mystery. Given that the UK government made a shambles of controlling the pandemic from the start in March ... why should anyone trust them in these novel vaccines? ... Until we have a substantial bank of data a 7 year moratorium should be placed on these vaccines to check for ADRs, unintended effects such as immune enhancement. At present the trials are designed to show these vaccines save lives or improve outcomes as recent BMJ articles highlight. The trials exclude elderly subjects with underlying conditions, so are not representative of the general population. I doubt the efficacy claims of 90% will be achieved" [reader's comment at source].


"Hypothetically speaking, if SARS-CoV-2 works like Dengue, which is also caused by an RNA virus, then anyone who has not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might actually be at increased risk for severe COVID-19 after vaccination, and only those who have already recovered from a bout of COVID-19 would be protected against severe illness by the vaccine. To be clear, we do not know whether that is the case or not, but these are important areas of inquiry and the current vaccine trials will simply not be able to answer this important question"
[source].

 

The Rush to Vaccinate: Short Duration of Study


"It is well established that vaccines can cause serious injury and death.  This acknowledgement is embodied in the UK government's compensation payments to victims of vaccine injury and death which, even with its restricted access, have paid out tens of millions.  Safe and effective vaccine development takes time, to assess short-term and long-term risks and benefits.  Despite this, dramatic media coverage and political pronouncements over the last eight months have created a false sense of urgency, justifying the fast tracking of a Covid Vaccine"
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects.  As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow.  Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"There seems to be a great rush for brining SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in market. People are also eager for the Vaccine. In ordinary course a drug takes about 10 years from concept to market. If a drug is fast-tracked, it still takes about 3 years to be approved for use. One has to be wary of haste in marketing vaccines. Following points must be kept in mind:

  • How long the Immunity conferred by the Vaccine will last?
  • If the virus mutates, will the Vaccine protect against the new mutant?
  • Will the Vaccine protect people of all geographic and ethnic origins equally well?
  • Will the Vaccine be suitable for people of all ages?
  • Will there by very late onset adverse effects of the Vaccine?" [Physician Arvind Joshi, letter to the British Medical Journal, source and source].


"[T]he medium to long-term side effects of this [Pfizer/BioNTech] product cannot possibly be known, because the study is still ongoing ... Simply put, neither those administering these jabs nor those receiving them can have any idea of the potential medium to long-term consequences of these things, because the companies producing them have not completed the studies on them" [source].
 

Known Risks


"The administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness.  Individuals receiving anti coagulant therapy or those with a bleeding disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injection, should not be given the vaccine unless the potential benefit clearly outweighs the risk of administration. Immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressant therapy, may have a diminished immune response to the vaccine.  No data are available about concomitant use of immunosuppressants"
[Reg 174 Information For UK Healthcare Professionals, source].
 

"[I]t must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized" [Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"In the early days of COVID-19, Baylor College of Medicine's Dr. Peter Hotez testified before Congress about the perils of rushing the development of a vaccine against it, mentioning the unique safety issues posed by this type of vaccine seen by scientists half a century ago when they were working with a vaccine against RSV. During those trials, not only did the vaccines fail to prevent infections, but 80% of the children who were infected needed to be hospitalized and two who were challenged with RSV died"
[source].



Allergies / Anaphylactoid Reactions


"The MHRA advice states: 'Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.' ... a very large number of people have a history of allergic reactions to a vaccine or medicine or food. Automatically, these people should not take the vaccine. But how many people in the general public are aware of this restriction?"
[source].

 

Adverse Drug Reactions

Please see here for C19 Vaccines Deaths and ADRs

 

mRNA ADRs (Pfizer and Moderna)

Please see here for mRNA Vaccines Deaths and ADRs

 

Hypocrisy: Death by Coincidence?

Please see here for MSM/Political Hypocrisy Concerning Vaccines Deaths and ADRs

 

Testing on Humans is Unethical


"[D]ue to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used.  This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19.  On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"Can anyone say any cov-19 vaccine is 100% safe? No ... mRNA vaccines - who knows long term effects? Viral vector vaccines - what about carcinogenicity problems? ... Immune enhancement? This planned rollout is plain madness, they are effectively doing a phase IV trial with Joe Public" [reader's comment at source].

 

C19 Vaccine Risks for the Elderly


"Covid Vaccine trial subjects are usually pre-screened to exclude people with many underlying health problems, but it is these people with underlying health problems, such as the elderly, who are likely to be the first receivers of the vaccine" 
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


We understand that any Covid Vaccine will likely be offered first to those who are most likely to suffer serious effects from SARS-CoV-2.  Since these vulnerable groups, elderly or with comorbidities, were not represented by participants in clinical trials, this lack of safety or efficacy data for these groups must be highlighted and presented to potential vaccinees so that they can give fully informed consent" 
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"Co-administration of the influenza vaccine with a Covid Vaccine is being proposed.  This could generate further safety issues, as this combination of vaccines has not been tested and proven to be safe and effective when administered together.  The influenza vaccine is known to challenge the immune systems of vaccines and can leave them temporarily vulnerable to other (non-influenza) upper respiratory infections, including coronaviruses.  There is also evidence suggesting that influenza vaccines may increase mortality from Covid-19 in the elderly" 
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"Recalling that animal studies conducted on prior COVID vaccines found pathogenic priming [adverse reactions] leading to disease enhancement in older animals more than younger animals, older adults may be at highest risk of serious chronic illness due to autoimmunity resulting from vaccine-induced pathogenic priming.  Dr. Anthony Fauci has informed the public that these vaccines do not stop transmission.  Therefore, the next dose of the viral proteins in the form of a natural infection for these study participants - a SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID19 - may be their last"
[source].


"[Re: Pfizer/BioNTech] The manufacturer cannot confirm how long immunity will last, nor what unforeseen side effects, adverse reactions might occur, especially to frail elderly folk with underlying conditions, who are sensitive to medication" [reader's comment at source].


"The vaccine adverse events that were seen in the Pfizer study might indicate pathogenic priming, particularly given the fact that more serious adverse events were seen when people got the second dose ... The problem is particularly pronounced among older trial participants in the over-55 group. The vaccinated group in this age range was 10 times more likely to experience a serious adverse effect upon being given the second dose of the vaccine verses the first dose compared to a rate of 1:1 that was seen in the unvaccinated"
[source].


"There's evidence showing the elderly - who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and would need the vaccine the most - are also the most vulnerable to ADE and Th2 immunopathology"
[source].


"A Bejing-based immunologist, who requested anonymity, [said] that the world should suspend the use of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine represented by Pfizer, as this new technology has not proven safety in large-scale use of in preventing any infectious disease. Older people, especially those over 80, should not be recommended to receive any COVID-19 vaccine, he said"
[source].


"[The elderly] have had a more difficult time escaping the corporate media propaganda
[includes the BBC in the UK] and adapting to the technology that allows them to do their own research and check and verify the propaganda coming through this Pharma-controlled corporate media. Those who only get their information from this corporate media are risking their lives, and these media outlets are guilty of mass murder, as they work hand in hand with Big Pharma Wall Street Billionaires to squelch any free speech that disagrees with them" [source].

 

C19 Vaccine --> The Wild Virus

Pathogenic Priming  /  Immune Enhancement Phenomenon  /  Antibody-Dependent Enhancement  /  Paradoxical Immune Enhancement
 

Pathogenic Priming / Paradoxical Immune Enhancement Phenomenon:  "means vaccinated people may still develop the disease, get sicker and die. And although they may refer to this as immune enhancement, which sounds positive, it can really be thought of as disease enhancement that is caused by initial exposure to the proteins of a pathogen, which is what primes the body to autoimmunity" [source].


"Previous attempts to develop coronavirus and other vaccines e.g., RSV and dengue, have been hampered by the problem of 'antibody dependent enhanced immunity' (ADEI), which has led to severe illness and deaths in the animals and human subjects involved in the trials.  This phenomenon only becomes apparent after vaccination, when the subject is exposed to wild virus at some point in the future.  Worryingly, the Covid Vaccine trials have not been conducted in a way to exclude the possibility of this serious sequalae occurring months or years after vaccination"
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"The formation of so-called 'non-neutralizing antibodies' can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, 'wild' virus after vaccination.  This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example.  In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"The patients in the study reviewed were healthy - and thus the spectrum of adverse events is not representative of those that might occur if the vaccine comes to market.  In the previous animals trials, the first dose was a vaccine, but the second was natural infection, leading to severe injury and often death.  In these human trials, both doses were from the vaccine, so it is also not reassuring that these adverse events did not include the more serious and deadly conditions that afflicted animals ... Recalling that animal studies conducted on prior COVID vaccines found pathogenic priming [adverse reactions] leading to disease enhancement in older animals more than younger animals, older adults may be at highest risk of serious chronic illness due to autoimmunity resulting from vaccine-induced pathogenic priming.  Dr. Anthony Fauci has informed the public that these vaccines do not stop transmission.  Therefore, the next dose of the viral proteins in the form of a natural infection for these study participants - a SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID19 - may be their last"
[source].


"In the early 2000s when vaccines were being developed against coronaviruses such as SARS-COV-1 and MERS, animal testing on the most promising vaccines seemed positive at first as the animals all developed strong antibody responses to the virus. However, when these vaccinated animals were exposed to the wild virus, it went far differently, with the vaccinated animals experiencing hyper-immune responses that cause inflammation throughout their bodies and particularly in their lungs"
[source].


"[P]revious coronavirus vaccine efforts - for SARS-CoV), (MERS-CoV), and RSV - have revealed a serious concern: The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement. What exactly does that mean? In a nutshell, it means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus' ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in a more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated. This is the exact opposite of what a vaccine is supposed to do, and a significant problem that has been pointed out from the very beginning of this push for a COVID-19 vaccine"
[source].


"Coronaviruses produce not just one but two different types of antibodies: (1) Neutralising antibodies, also referred to as immoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, that fight the infection, (2) Binding antibodies (also known as non-neutralizing antibodies) that cannot prevent viral infection.  Instead of preventing viral infection, binding antibodies trigger an abnormal immune response known as 'paradoxical immune enhancement.'  Another way to look at this is your immune system is actually backfiring and not functioning to protect you but actually making you worse. Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the running are using mRNA to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S protein). The spike protein, which is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell, is the first stage of the two-stage process viruses use to gain entry into cells. The idea is that by creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will commence production of antibodies, without making you sick in the process. The key question is, which of the two type of antibodies are being produced through this process?
[source].


"Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, RSV, and SARS have shown a paradoxical phenomenon: Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated. The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection" [source].


"The super-healthy cohorts studied by Moderna are in no way representative of the U.S. population. Most deaths from COVID-19 involve pre-existing health conditions of the types excluded fro0m both Pfizer and Moderna trials ... Those enrolling in the post-market surveillance studies deserve to know the abject absence of any relevant information on efficacy and risk fro them. In their zeal to help humanity, or to help themselves, these people may very well be walking into a situation that will cause autoimmunity due to pathogenic priming, potentially leading to disease enhancement should they become infected following vaccination" [source].


"'Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity' ... the same may apply post-vaccination" [source].


"Epitopes are sites on the virus that allow antibodies or cell receptors in your immune systems to recognize it ... some epitopes can cause 'autoimmunological pathogenic priming due to prior infection or following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 ... following vaccination.'  In other words, if you've had the infection once, and get re-infected (either by SARS-CoV-2 or a sufficiently similar coronavirus), the second bout has a great potential to be more severe than the first. Similarly, if you get vaccinated and are then infected with SARS-CoV-2, your infection may be more severe than had you not been vaccinated" [source].

 

C19 Vaccine --> Immunity/Transmission


"As with any vaccine, vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 may not protect all vaccine recipients"
[Reg 174 Information For UK Healthcare Professionals, source].
 

There is "no evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it's going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on" [WHO, quoted at source].


"[E]ven if vaccination is 'successful', meaning that production of protective antibodies has taken place, it does not guarantee immunity.  To worsen matters, anti-body production spontaneously wanes after just a few months.  Protection, if any at all, is at best short-lived"
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020, p.103].


"Recalling that animal studies conducted on prior COVID vaccines found pathogenic priming [adverse reactions] leading to disease enhancement in older animals more than younger animals, older adults may be at highest risk of serious chronic illness due to autoimmunity resulting from vaccine-induced pathogenic priming.  Dr. Anthony Fauci has informed the public that these vaccines do not stop transmission.  Therefore, the next dose of the viral proteins in the form of a natural infection for these study participants - a SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to COVID19 - may be their last"
[source].


"...nor can they confirm when the vaccine prevents transmission of sars-cov-2. Imagine going to your VW dealer to buy a new Golf and they told you in the show room, you can have any colour and engine size, however we cannot say whether the brakes work or how long you can drive it on a full gas tank. You would not buy one"
[reader's comment at source].


"This is where the nuance gets a bit tricky. The vaccines are not designed to prevent transmission. They are designed to prevent infection in the event of exposure; while others may lessen the severity of the disease in the event of infection" [reader's comment at source].


"Here's an important point: COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection ... a 'successful' vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms. They're not even looking at reducing infection, hospitalization or death rates" [source].


"[T]he three major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were designed to prevent nothing more than a 'mild case of Covid-19.'  That means a cough, or chills and fever. Serious cases of illness? Hospitalisation? Death? These were not on the radar of the clinical trials. Cough, or chills and fever, cure themselves naturally. No need for a vaccine. So ... what rational person would line up to take the COVID shot?"
[source].

 

C19 Vaccines and Fertility


Syncytin-1:  "The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2.  However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


Syncytin-1:  "Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1
(see Gallaher, B., 'Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses' - source), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written material provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post-vaccination infertility could be observed" [Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source, 01 Dec 2020].


hCG: 
“The Rockefellers’ Population Council and other research organizations joined with the WHO in 1972 to create a Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. By 1995, they were able to report progress in ‘developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine’, which works by combining an immunogen formed from a synthetic peptide of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) – a hormone secreted by the surface of the early embryo to remain implanted in the womb - with a toxoid carrier molecule. The vaccine stimulates an immune reaction, causing women to develop antibodies against the hormone, thus preventing them from carrying babies to term. But beginning in the 1990s, a series of scandals over WHO-led vaccination programmes in the third world led to allegations that tetanus vaccines in places like the Philippines and Kenya were being laced with hCG in order to implement population control by stealth. The controversy generated by these stories led global institutions to step back from the campaign to champion population by vaccine. But, as usual, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were there to renew interest, working with the UK government to host a ‘London Summit on Family Planning’ in 2012 at which the Foundation announced their support for funding the research, development and deployment of injectable contraceptives to the developing world"
[source].


"[T]he University of Miami has reported it is following up on its earlier discovery of the virus present in men's testicles up to six months after infection. Now the researchers are investigating whether the vaccine's Covid genetic information may do likewise and interfere with sperm quality and reproduction"
[source].


"Women of childbearing age may also be at risk for infertility, as syncytin (the gammaretrovirus envelope coded in the human genome the expression of which can be dysregulated by the synthetic syncytin RNA in the vaccine) is required for proper fusion of the placenta in the uterus and implantation of the egg. Indeed, the WHO is now saying pregnant women should not get the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines due to reports of late-term miscarriages" [source].

 

C19 Virus, C19 Vaccine, Cold Viruses, Flu Viruses, Flu Jab


"Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction:  No interaction studies have been performed.  Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not been studied"
[Reg 174 Information For UK Healthcare Professionals, source].


"Co-administration of the influenza vaccine with a Covid Vaccine is being proposed.  This could generate further safety issues, as this combination of vaccines has not been tested and proven to be safe and effective when administered together.  The influenza vaccine is known to challenge the immune systems of vaccinees and can leave them temporarily vulnerable to other (non-influenza) upper respiratory infections, including coronaviruses.  There is also evidence suggesting that influenza vaccines may increase mortality from Covid-19 in the elderly" 
[UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Open Letter to MHRA, JCVI, Matt Hancock, source].


"The question must ... be raised if a vaccine for COVID-19 might result in ... robust antibody reaction, followed by extreme illness when the actual virus is encountered. Is this perhaps even a factor in the deadly 'cytokine storm' (autoimmune reaction) that already occurs in a few COVID patients? It would be interesting to see a study undertaken on COVID victims who succumbed to autoimmune reaction, and determine just how many previously received annual free flu shots"
[James Perloff, Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come: Red-Pilled, (August 2020), p.135].


"Negative Vaccine Effectiveness: The increase in risk of illness from influenza and non-influenza viruses associated with (or caused by) the [flu] vaccines
(Cowling, Clin Inf Dis 2012; 54:1778) ... a [flu] vaccine 'effective' in one season may increase influenza risk in a subsequent season" [source].


"It is well known that persons vaccinated against the flu will frequently contract the virus, become ill and spread it to others"
[source].


"The concern arising from the present report
[Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus (2012)] is for an immunopathogenic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-Cov, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS. Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses, particularly those of the type 2 group" [source].


"Aside from the chronic diseases listed earlier, others who are at high risk from these COVID-19 gene therapies include those who have gotten seasonal influenza vaccines, Blacks and Hispanics"
[source].

 

C19 Vaccines and PCR Tests


"[D]ue to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used.  This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19.  On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se"
[Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Lung Specialist, and Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research, source].


"There is also the lingering myth of the PCR test as a reliable standard for diagnosing Covid infections. Due to the widespread abuse of PCR, which was never designed nor intended to be relied upon as a confirmatory diagnostic tool, a growing number of medical experts argue that the US, the UK, Germany and other EU nations are facing a 'casedemic' rather than a pandemic due to a pathogenic virus. Despite PCR's high rate of misdiagnosis, positive results are still being reported as Covid cases"
[source].

 

Ingredients

 

Moral and Ethical Problems


Does the Vaccine Contain Aborted Foetal Tissue?
  "MRC-5 cells were obtained in 1966 from the lungs of a 14-week male foetus. These were used to produce a cell line which is used in vaccines such as those for Covid-19.  A cell line is a clone of cultured cells derived from an identified parental cell type (in this case, the lung tissue of a 14-week old foetal boy).  So, it is incorrect to say that there is actual foetal tissue in the vaccines, but it is correct to say that it is tissue derived from aborted foetal tissue ... [does that] make it any less ethically problematic? There are still problems with the principle of this"
[source].


"Several commonly used human cell lines developed for this function were established from cells taken from electively aborted human fetuses. The use of cells from electively aborted fetuses for vaccine production makes these five COVID-19 vaccine programs
[The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is one of these five, while the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines do so for some of their tests] potentially controversial and could reduce willingness of some to use the vaccine. While some may see no ethical problem, for many a straight line can be drawn from the ending of a human life in an an abortion to a vaccine or drug created using cells derived from the harvesting of the fetal tissue. Even if the cells have been propagated for years in the laboratory far removed from the abortion, that connection line remains ... Adherence to the highest ethical standards in science and medicine serves all humanity, because it values the dignity of every human life and respects the consciences of all, without exploitation of any group" [source].


"In addition to standard concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is the moral dilemma of taking vaccines made with aborted fetal cells. For many, this alone is a cause for objection. Several of the vaccine candidates, including AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, are made using aborted fetal cell lines ... for many [people], the issue is not that the vaccine might contain actual cells from an aborted fetus. It's the fact that a fetus was used in the production - in any way ... The fact is, fetal cells ARE used production of certain vaccines, and some may object to getting those vaccines because they object to abortion and/or feel it's unethical to harvest aborted fetuses for their tissue"
[source].


"Commonly Used Fetal Cell Lines:  There are several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originate from aborted fetuses, including:

  • HEK293 - human embryonic cell line originally derived form kidney tissue obtained from a female fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1972;
  • MRC5 - human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-weel-old male fetus aborted in 1966;
  • PER.C6 - human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985;
  • WI38 - human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 12-week-old female fetus aborted in 1961.

"Vaccine makers using at least one of these fetal cell lines in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include:

  • AstraZeneca (HEK293);
  • Jansen Research and Development (owned by Johnson & Johnson), (PER.C6);
  • CanSino Biologics (HEK293);
  • University of Pittsburgh (HEK293);
  • ImmunityBio (HEK293);
  • Altimmune (PER.C6)" [source].


"I must stress that I would not take any vaccine that included this parental cell-type [aborted foetal tissue], no matter how far removed from the source it may be"
[Elizabeth McDonald, email to H---------, 03 December 2020].


"Dr Helen Watt of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre in Oxford, England, [said] that the Pfizer vaccine 'makes no use of a foetal cell-line in the production process itself, and no use in the design' but '[o]ne of the confirmatory lab tests on the vaccine did sadly involve an old foetal cell-line' ... the Pfizer vaccine is tested using the HEK 293 cell line, which is derived from kidney tissue taken from a healthy baby who was aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s"
[source].


"We are looking to the vaccine, instead of repentance, for our help and salvation. Isaiah 30 and 31 tell the story of the Israelites failing to listen to the word of the LORD. They do not consult him, but instead carry out plans that are not his, and go down to Egypt for help. Because it is not God's plan, the LORD says that Egypt [i.e. the vaccine] will be 'utterly useless' to them ... Not only are we looking to [the vaccine] as an alternative to repentance to get us out of the crisis: there are ethical concerns to do with the vaccine themselves. They have been produced with the help of aborted fetal cell lines, and the practice of organ harvesting from healthy, wrongly killed babies continues today around the world"
[source].


"The Bible is clear that when it comes to the good things which all of humanity enjoys they come from God. But we should be careful in attributing to God things which He hasn't expressly taken credit for. I have to admit I have winced when I've heard Christians giving thanks to God for the vaccine. Can we really attribute something of such questionable origins to God? Surely just the association with child sacrifice is enough to testify against these vaccines as being blessings from God ... the very fact that these vaccines are linked with the practice of abortion should signal to us as Christians that there's something not quite right here"
[source].


"I don't think we really know God as we ought to if we think that [the vaccine] is his gift to us, as if he would give us something out of the fruit of child sacrifice and it would be our way out of judgment for child sacrifice even though we are still not repenting of child sacrifice. Yes, Christians have been praying for the vaccine, and so it is unsurprising that they think that this is God's answer ... Yes: we can pray to the living God for our idols. Shocking! The fact that we prayed for this and it has come is no evidence whatsoever that it's a gift from God"
[source].


"We are meant to be repenting, but instead we are turning to a vaccine that is itself produced with the fruit of the very practice we're meant to be repenting of. Why is this not ringing alarm bells? ... even if we were to lay aside ethical concerns to do with the vaccine, the absence of repentance alone means that the vaccine cannot be our 'way out; of the crisis, not God's way out. We still haven't learned, we still haven't repented"
[source].



The Precautionary Principle


"[W]hy are we failing to discuss, let alone adhere, to the precautionary principle [PP] before this massive undertaking to produce and distribute potentially billions of vaccines to inoculate the global population? The PP quite simply states that any new medical intervention with results that are either disputed or unknown should be avoided. In fact, the PP has frequently been invoked for products or processes that would introduce genetically modified organisms or foods for consumption. Now we are injecting questionably genetically engineered substances into human bodies, ad worse there are voices that want to mandate this enormously expensive experiment long before any reliable medical consensus can be reached on their long-term safety. If the PP had been respected and honored during the past 100 years, the US would have prevented ... life-long injuries and deaths due to ... the swine flu and Gardasil vaccines that were also rushed to market without proper scientific oversight"
[source].

 

The Pharmaceutical Companies (Big Pharma)

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power" [Benito Mussolini]
 

"The only incentive for a Covid-19 vaccine is that it is an enormous cash cow for the drug industry" [source].


"[When asked the question], 'Even though I've had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?' ... Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla [replied] that the pharmaceutical company was 'not certain' if the vaccine prevented the coronavirus from being transmitted ... 'I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now with what we know'
[quoted at source].


"Various drug companies will have put large sums into researching a vaccine for Covid. They know that if they can patent it, and charge only £10 per dose (tiny for modern drugs) they can make £700 million. So how incentivised are they to say 'yep, we are close to herd immunity and anyway chloroquine which we can't make a penny from works so you don't need to be vaccinated'"
[reader's comment at source].


"Good science is not possible without questions and dissent. Good science is never closed or consensus in any concrete way. Good medicine is the same. We seem to have very little of either when it comes to vaccines. This reflects the fact that allopathic science-medicine denies or has forgotten natural function and now relies totally on often toxic drugs and vaccines, where of course it cannot wield a knife. Surely this is just another form of 'snake oil' in more sophisticated  form for a modern age? One thing is certain, modern allopathic medicine has not brought health or even a greater capacity for cure. Having body parts regularly removed and medication for life along with constantly being vaccinated is not cure and it is certainly not health"
[reader's comment at source].


"I understand that in UK and US - perhaps also other 'developed nations', iatrogenic illness is officially third in the charts for 'cause of death'" [reader's comment at source].


"...CDC and NIH in collusion with the pharmaceutical industrial complex, Bill Gates, many of our leading corporate-funded medical schools and institutions, and across the ideological spectrum of the media. All are heavily invested in the new generations of Covid vaccines and whatever new novel drugs [are] in the pipeline and to invalidate the highly effective and cheap drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine and invermectin, that have been proven to treat Covid infections quickly and safely. This is the same artifice of corporate scoundrels and their media escorts that have relied on faulty science, fabricate their own research to serve their financial interests, and hide behind a cloak of non-transparency who Fauci [and SAGE in the UK] now encourages us to openheartedly trust as Covid vaccines reach your local clinics and downtown pharmacies" [source].


Patrick Vallance: SAGE Advisor to the British Government

 

Matt Hancock: British Health Minister:

"Hancock owns the Porton Biopharma Ltd company in his capacity of Minister of Health.  That was formed in June 2018, when 'Public Health England' transferred its drug development programs to it.  Thus PHE will receive a dividend from any vaccines developed there.  If it is profiting from vaccine sales it cannot be independent.  Can a Minister of Health really own a subsidiary of Britain's chief biological warfare unit" [Nick Kollerstrom, PhD, The Great British Coronavirus Hoax: A Sceptic's View, (October 2020), p.94].


Susan Michie (SAGE):

"'Conservative' PM Johnson has some interesting advisors. I've just been reading Wiki about one of Johnson's SAGE Committee members, Dr. Susan Michie.  I quote: 'Michie is a member of the Covid-19 Behavioural Science Advisory Group and the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group of Behaviours, a sub-group of SAGE. She also sits in the Independent SAGE committee, chaired by Sir David King. She frequently contributes to national news media during the Covid-19 pandemic as an expert in behaviour change. She is a member of the Communist Party of Britain (CPB), but donated to the Labour Party under the Corbyn leadership. In March 2018, Michie, described as a leading member of the CPB, said that the party would no longer stand against Labour in general elections and CPB members should be 'working full tilt' for the election of Corbyn as PM.'  Who better, then, than a Communist Party expert in 'Behaviour Change' to guide a 'Conservative' PM (and us) along the path of individual freedom and personal liberty? After all, a bullet in the back of the head in the cellars of the Lubyanka proved quite effective in changing behaviour. Even, Johnson should carefully note, the behaviour of eminent politicians. What's not to like?" [reader's comment at source].

 

Big Pharma: Legal Indemnity


"C19 makers will be indemnified from financial liability no matter how many casualties they may cause.  That is so wrong!  They need to be fully responsible for ... adverse reactions"
[Nick Kollerstrom, PhD, The Great British Coronavirus Hoax: A Sceptic's View, (October 2020), p.93].


"To take advantage of the indemnity afforded by government agencies, it is in the vaccine developers' interest to do the minimum in safety studies. If it can be shown [that] the developer knew before any injury that they were aware the insult was likely to occur, they lose this government protection"  /  "That won't happen if it can also be shown the regulators or government have taken some kind of inducement" [reader's comment at source].

 

Bill Gates

EUGENICS:  "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services [abortion], we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%" [Bill Gates, source and source].

"For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Matthew 16:26).


"The influence and mega-bucks of Bill Gates and Big Pharma is supposedly not skewing the debate. Bill Gates' donations to Prof Lockdown Ferguson's Imperial College, or to the WHO, make no difference, and Bill Gates' desire to produce seven billion doses of vaccine does not give him a financial interest. Bill Gates is a nice guy who knows a lot about computer viruses, so we should all look to him as our Saviour from this virus. I fancy there's more logic in Alice in Wonderland"
[source].
 

"Bill Gates, who is heavily invested in all of these vaccines, is eager to profit over their future prospects:

'We need to make billions of doses', Gates wrote on his blog page, 'we need to get them out to every part of the world, and we need all of this to happen as quickly as possible.'

"We might add: and damn the regulations and high safety standards that could hinder us" [source].


"Just how much slavery will we accept?  Bill Gates sees himself as having a major say in world events. He recently stated that:

'The question of which businesses should keep going is tricky. We still need water, electricity and the internet. Supply chains for critical things need to be maintained. Countries are still figuring out what to do to keep running. Eventually we will have digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.'

"This concept of a 'digital certificate' to store information and to grant access to rights or services is part of a massive project that is propelled by a powerful group called ID2020 which is backed by the United Nations, the Rockefeller Foundation and Bill Gates' Microsoft.  Gates envisages that 'Digital Certificates' will be used to determine who had COVID-19, who recovered from it, who was recently tested for it and who received the vaccine. However, these are to be imbedded 'certificates' that also provide additional information, similar to the chips that Veterinarians imbed in horses and pets. An article published by ID2020 in 2018 stated that vaccines are the perfect way to introduce digital identity to the world... The 'digital health card can be used to access secondary services, such as primary school, or ease the process of obtaining alternative credentials.'  Will the plebs accept that much slavery?" [reader's comment at source].


"India kicked Bill Gates and his vaccines OUT because he was damaging people. Africa caught him slipping birth control into his vaccines and also having adverse effect on people"
[comment at source].


"Gates' obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.  Promising to eradicate polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India's National Advisory Board and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5.  Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children.  In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates' vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB.  Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously ... In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK's experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children"
[source].


"[T]here is a massive international web driving the Gates' global vaccination agenda in tandem with the vaccine industry, including the WHO, Gavi Alliance, CDC, NIAID, CEPI, IHME, and many other organizations, including Imperial College London, the home of the 'modelling' by Neil Ferguson, et al"
[source].


"Bill Gates has world leaders at his beck and call ... [he] has also been instrumental in hindering consideration of vaccine safety ... Bill Gates deliberately sabotaged the establishment of a Vaccine Safety Commission in the US ... when he met Donald Trump on two occasions, including in the White House in 2017, Trump asked Gates 'if vaccines weren't a bad thing, because [Trump] was considering a commission to look into ill effects of vaccines', and that Robert Kennedy Jr. 'was advising [Trump] that vaccines were causing bad things.'  Gates told Trump, '...no, that's a dead end, that would be a bad thing, don't do that.'"
[source].


"The influence of Bill Gates on the disproportionate and ill-targeted response to SARS-CoV-2 is a massive international scandal, particularly the questionable rush to global coronavirus vaccination. We so desperately need a properly functioning 'fourth estate' to investigate this matter, instead of the biased and deeply conflicted corporate media which is working to hinder transparency and accountability for international vaccination policy and vaccine product safety"
[source].


"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves" (Matthew 7:15)  /  "For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Mark 8:36-37)  /  "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1).

 

Digital Implants


"The biggest question here is not necessarily the 'vaccination', but the payload Mr Gates wishes to include within it!  Highly suspicious that he 'foretold' (and even CALLED it) Covid19 (in 2017). He has an interest in the Wuhan Lab it came from, and he denied members of the Trump administration access to a meeting at DAVOS where they were discussing Digital Implant Technology"
[reader's comment at source].

 

God-Given (aka Natural) Immunity and Herd Immunity

Please see also here and here for natural and God-given ways to strengthen our immune systems and our general health
 

"That's what your immune system is for... dealing with bacteria and viruses"  /  "Not one bit of advice on how to strengthen your immune system, nah, let's get a rushed vaccine with no information of the contents of the vaccine to the people... I feel sorry for the people going out to get the jab and their kids because no doubt in the future they will regret it"  /  "Those who have had covid already have immunity, the immunity in our system that God gave us already. How does this not count? ... why would you need further introduction of covid when your own immunity already knows what it is? They lie, lie, and lie again, people" [viewers' comments at source].


"Another risk is that we are going down the path of multiple vaccinations for multiple disease or variants of diseases for which the long-tern implications cannot be known. The human immune system ... is phenomenal. It is usually only when a person is very old or ill that it might not work effectively. What could the effect of mass multiple vaccinations be on future generations' immune systems? Might immune systems be less stimulated to develop without the naturally evolved
[EMcD: God-created] drive that has made us what we are today? We should ask these questions" [source].

 

Medical Professionals


"There are plenty of decent intelligent medical professionals in many fields who will tell you the Covid experimental vaccine is dangerous to us"  /  "I think any doctor knows their career is in jeopardy these days if they don't play the game, though they may persuade themselves of other much more ethical reasons. It's about conformity"
[reader's comment at source].

 

Fake News and Conspiracy Theories

Vaccine 'Hesitancy'...  Vaccine 'Disinformation'...  Anti-coronavaxxers are the New Racists...  Straw Men and Ad Hominems...

But who fact-checks the 'fact-checkers?'...

"Vaccine Misinformation: a term currently applied to any statement that departs from official pronouncements, regardless of its truth" [source].

"Let Truth and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse, in a free and open encounter?" [John Milton, Areopagitica, (1644)].


"There is no place for critical opinions in either the public press or the public broadcasts.  The only alternative was by means of the social media, where the public could be informed via YouTube videos.  But even here, freedom of expression is merely lip service ... WhatsApp reacted as well.  The forward function was restricted in order to contain the distribution of Fake News during the coronavirus crisis.  But who exactly determines if news is fake?  What if our own government distributes Fake News?"
[Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020, pp.123-124].


"Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching TV news which is sensational and not very good.  Personally, I view this COVID outbreak as akin to a bad winter influenza epidemic.  We are suffering from a media epidemic"
[Professor John Oxford, Virologist, quoted in Dr. Karina Reiss, Biologist, and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Microbiologist and Medical Professor, Corona: False Alarm? Facts and Figures, (September 2020, p.124].


"[A]sk yourself why a more open and public discussion is not being conducted to address the evidence for these very legitimate concerns and fears ... The conspiracy theorists are not the parents caring for neurologically damaged children for the remainder of their lives.  The real denialists are those in the mainstream media who are too lazy, biased or lack a moral conscience to perform proper due diligence and mine the scientific literature for answers.  Do yourself a favor.  Simply don't listen to them.  And when Gates, Fauci, Trump, Biden or any state governor
[EMcD: Hancock, Whitty, Vallence, Ferguson in the UK] begin talking about the 'awesome' promises of a Covid-19 vaccine or its mandate, turn off your television or computer screen.  These people are only the profiteers protecting the vaccine makers and in the event of vaccine injuries we are just collateral damage in the 'War Against Corona'" [source].


"I suggest the Corona hysteria - and the people exploiting it - can be quickly overcome if enough of us simply disconnect from the television/radio propaganda blitz and practice using our brains again.  The Covid 19 hysteria can only be sustained by subjecting us to a 24/7 chorus of 'important people' making threats, warnings and promises of help so long as we obey them ... we can - and should - stop consuming tv and radio products which serve no purpose but to keep us anxious and afraid.  The world looks very different if you do not watch television or listen to radio ... In every medium the desired effect is hypnosis, acceptance and belief, and will invariably succeed so long as the same voices are heard and the same mindless catchphrases drummed into our brains: flatten the curve, slow the spread, save the NHS, stand on one leg, all vaccines are safe..."
[source].


"The WHO declared 'vaccine hesitancy' to be among the 'top ten threats to global health' (January 2019).  Then the CEO of YouTube has announced that it will be deleting any video deemed to be in contravention of advice being by the WHO.  These are very authoritarian steps" 
[Nick Kollerstrom, PhD, The Great British Coronavirus Hoax: A Sceptic's View, (October 2020), p.93].


"Maybe you're someone who believes in the autonomy of your own body and questions this hastily developed vaccine? You're an 'anti-vaxxer' and Starmer wants you criminalised. Or perhaps you are a concerned medical professional with a legitimate second opinion from official state policy? You must be shamed into silence for your dangerous opinions. If you protest you will be met with state crackdown"
[source].


"Orwellian censorship and the gaslighting of dissent in service to the interests of Big Pharma has more recently become universal in the liberal print and online news sites once presumed to be the antidote to corporate subversion of democracy ... It's a bad omen for democracy when citizens can no longer conduct civil, informed debates about critical policies that impact the vitality of our economy, public health, personal freedoms and constitutional rights. Censorship is violence and this systematic muzzling of debate which proponents justify as a measure to curtail dangerous polarization is actually fueling those divisions"
[source].


"Diverse opinions are good and robust discussion is imperative if we are going to find the truth which leads to sustainable solutions"  /  "Just today I heard a long segment on [Gates' Foundaton-funded] NPR about vaccine misinformation. It put up straw men as examples of this (e.g., 5g cell tower radiation causes COVID 19), but failed to mention any of the valid critiques of the COVID vaccine (e.g., PEG allergies, pathogenic priming, safety studies that did not use a saline placebo, etc).  Funny how the MSM does not address valid concerns about safety and testing"
[reader's comment at source].


"A large percentage of our country simply cannot believe that our government and its Fourth Estate lie to us. They think dishonesty exists in politics, but openly relegated to smaller issues like tax returns, going to restaurants during a lockdown, etc. Goebbels said, 'If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State'."
[reader's comment at source].


"If you put your head in the sand you don't have to deal with thinking about anything uncomfortable, as I am finding with so many of my acquaintances who blindly want to believe that the vaccines are safe because the 'experts' say they are. They don't want top delve any deeper"  /  "Friends and family who refuse to listen to us even when we present them with solid independent science. They call us conspiracy theorists, with nothing solid to back up their claims"  /  "...they ask you in the kindest of voices, where are you getting your information from? As if intelligent people cannot keep abreast of what is happening and have an alternative view! Or they tell you, also kindly, that the 'fact checkers' have debunked this - not taking into account that all the major 'fact checkers' all lead back to being paid by Bill Gates if you follow the trail, and keeping in mind that 70% of the media in the US is funded by big pharma in the US. There is no way they are going to go against the grain and lose out on their pay or for people in the media to risk being sacked if they say anything anti-vaccine and upset the sponsors!"
[readers' comments at source].
 

"Why must vaccines not be questioned? My first thought on heating this is what do they have to hide? I will be honest, I accepted all vaccines without question, I now realise I was under this mindset that science must not be questioned. Nothing in a civilised society should be free from exploration to gather information or knowledge, so what is so threatening to them that they shut down all discourse on vaccinations unless it completely agrees with the pharmaceutical corporate line. This much power is unhealthy and should not be tolerated in a free society"  /  "But unfortunately a large percentage of the population is still under the mindset you had previously. And even as side effects to these dangerous experimental vaccines become apparent, many will believe the usual spin that the vaccine isn't to blame"  /  "Sadly it's getting harder for those who haven't previously educated themselves to find the truth, due to the unprecedented censorship, the relentless fear-mongering, and constant promotion of vaccines as the holy grail of good health"  /  "Pharma profits need defending. But more fundamentally they need to defend the idea that science is cleverer than nature, and that man is a kind of god who needs nothing higher than himself" [readers' comments at source].


"What exactly is a 'conspiracy theory type'? Someone who knows a scam when they see one?"  /  "Conspiracy theory types? Those people who don't automatically bend over and accept information that is spoon-fed to them without checking the sources? I believe I'm one of them"  /  "Conspiracy theorist = Critical thinker"  /  "'You can call me a conspiracy theorist when I can call you a coincidence theorist'"
[viewers' comments at source].


"If you have done your own research and learned the facts surrounding these experimental mRNA COVID injections, which legally cannot even be defined as 'vaccines' ... and have determined that it is not wise to risk being injected with these experimental products ... you probably have friends and family members who are attacking you, perhaps even viciously, because they are only relying on what the Government and Big Pharma, along with their corporate media, are reporting ... I get angry and threatening emails every day from people who believe I am not fit to live, and that I should burn in hell for opposing vaccines. And many of them are 'Christians'. Here is an example of an email I received yesterday:

Subject:  your 'news articles' about Covid 19 Vaccine

Message Body:  You are being used of Satan to undermine truth. God help you. I have been a Christian 75 years, and a minister and church pastor more than 40 years. Conspiracy theory does not become a child of God... one-sided, 'patriotic', false use of God's Word to bolster such a view is despicable. Prove to me any of this news and I will apologize. Where in Hell did you get your 'information'? What is your purpose? I am praying for your repentance.

"I do not respond to emails like this, because everything I publish is well documented and sourced, and needs no defense against ad hominem attacks. When people cannot debate based on the merits of the facts, they always resort to name calling and personal attacks, and often an appeal to authority (I know more than you because I have important credentials!).  I encourage everyone facing similar attacks to walk away from them and do NOT engage" [source].


"Most people who have received one of these injections, or plan to receive one, would probably [reason they are doing so] 'To prevent me getting the COVID-19 virus, or prevent me from spreading it to others.'  For those of use trying to shine truth and light into darkness and deception, I really think this is where the conversation needs to begin. For those who are less informed and simply have a religious-like faith in vaccines in general, and the experimental COVID injections specifically, without ever having spent much time actually researching them, we need to ... ask them to defend their faith in these shots, and then be prepared to answer their positive beliefs in these shots with verifiable facts that they can look up and research themselves"
[source].


"Enjoying your lockdown? Here's my list of crazy conspiracy predictions for what's next ... Goodbye right to refuse compulsory govt needles firing govt health right into your bloodstream. Get needles - and your certificate to prove it - or else you won't get your benefits / mortgage / kid into school / holiday abroad / bus pass - did you get your jab yet? How about we pop an electronic tracking device into the vaccination? Just in case ... Crazy stuff, huh? Go take a look out the window"
[source].

 

Revelation 13 and 14

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six" (Revelation 13:15-18).

"And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name" (Revelation 14:9-11).

"Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labours; and their works do follow them" (Revelation 14:12-13).
 

"There doesn't sound anything scary about a unit that calls itself the Behavioural Insights Team but they did say, 'one of the key lessons from [ex-communist] Slovakia was that people must be given a "strong incentive to get tested" - such as giving them greater freedom from curbs on movement if they test negative.'  See what they have done there? They have switched incentive and punishment. Only in a fascist state where curbs on your freedom are the default position is lessening those curbs seen as an 'incentive'.  No, what they are proposing is letting you leave home only if you get tested regularly (which will turn into being vaccinated regularly) by giving you a wristband or government-approved 'papers'.  No papers - no freedom ... Only if you are Covid-free/vaccinated may you leave. Otherwise you will be prosecuted/persecuted.  I mean, there is nothing scary about the government having a unit that seeks ways fundamentally to control and change public behaviour" [source].
 

"A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations, cashless payments, and potential law enforcement applications. Mastercard is now touting itself as a leader toward a 'World Beyond Cash', and its partnership with GAVI marks a fresh and new approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records and a payment system into a single cohesive platform. Of course, it will start in the testing ground areas like West Africa and eventually make its way to the entire world as a requirement.  It should be of extreme interest to anyone that is observing the emerging tyranny in our world that DARPA has funded a company that produces soft and flexible hydro-gels that are injected beneath the skin for the purpose of health monitoring.  It syncs to a smartphone health user app to give the user health insights.  But before any doubters of the emergence of the biblical Antichrist narrative scoff and fall to the ground in delightful spasms over this 'cool' technology, you should understand that hydro-gel nano-technology grows and spreads throughout the body once it is implanted, possibly affecting the DNA of a person.  It can then send information directly and continuously to an artificial intelligence.  Many phones, if not all, have health apps that can be disabled, but not gotten rid of.  These covid-19 contact tracing apps are now being rolled out across the globe.  They can literally monitor everything about you" [reader's comment at source].


"It is important to understand that these forthcoming Covid-19 vaccines are not safe by any scientific methodology.  This recombinant DNA and RNA technology can, and will, cause permanent and unknown changes in a person's DNA.  Think about that alarming fact.  Once a person receives this DNA-changing technology into their bodies, he or she will live with this change for the rest of their miserable lives.  This is to say nothing of the ripple effects of this DNA change.  This literally and quite potentially is creating a new species.  The old gets destroyed, the new gets created.  Perhaps now it is easy to understand why Revelation 13 and 14 reveals that those who take this mark in their hand or their forehead will be damned.  They will no longer be human.  They are literally setting us up for this beastly and monstrous techno-tyranny over a virus con-job"
[reader's comment at source].


"ID2020 proposes to hook us all up to an artificial intelligence interface.  Obviously, this is not about a 'deadly virus'.  This is about the eventual implementation of the Antichrist's mark of the beast system as described in revelation 13.  ID2020 is a project initiated by the Rockefeller Foundation, Bill Gates and Microsoft, transnational pharmaceutical corporations and technology firms [and they] are pushing the concept that every human on the planet needs biometric verification because 'to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right' according to the ID2020 website.  A vaccine purportedly designed to combat COVID-19 will no doubt become mandatory and those who resist will be blacklisted as public health criminals.  You may find yourself locked out of participation in society, similar to the way the Chinese citizens are suffering under China's totalitarian social credit system.  But this coming system will dramatically affect a person's DNA and, for those who take the mark of the beast, their eternal soul"
[reader's comment at source].


"In Noah's day, the sons of men and the sons of God mixed and produced hybrids which, by definition, were unsaveable.  Therefore, God had to destroy them, which He did in the world-wide flood.  If God had not done so, these hybrids would have continually reproduced in kind and thereby destroyed God's plan of salvation for Adam's descendants.  Scripture tells us that the last days will be like the days of Noah.  One of these similarities may be the creating of hybrid humans of some kind.  The Bible also warns us against taking 'The Mark of the Beast' because it will damn us to hell.  Why will it do that?  If the Mark of the Beast causes a hybridisation of mankind in some way, then, as in the Days of Noah, these hybrids will become unsaveable.  How might this modern-day hybridisation - or, if you prefer, transhumanism - come about?  Vaccinations could very easily become the means of achieving it.  There may indeed be no (or few) problems with the ingredients of any initial C19 vaccine, but that may simply be Boiling the Frog: i.e. lull the people into a false sense of security with the first few harmless doses, and then gradually start to alter the ingredients, so that any C19 vaccine will, at some stage, disrupt our humanity.  That eventual salvation-destroying vaccine may or may not be the current Pfizer one, but it could very well become so further down the line"
[source].

 

Scriptures

On 21st June 2020, the Lord gave me the following scriptures regarding putting our trust in (a) Test and Trace [PCR test], and (b) C19 Vaccines:

  • Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.  They are brought down and fallen: but we are risen, and stand upright (Psalm 20:7-8);
  • The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD (Proverbs 21:31) [Elizabeth McDonald, 06 December 2020].

 

FDA: Draft List of C19 Vaccines' Possible Side Effects

"Since I believe everyone is entitled to know what side effects there could be with a heavily promoted vaccine, I'm going to read you the official list of possible side effects.  This is, remember, not my list but a draft list compiled by the FDA in the US:

Guillain-Barre syndrome  /  Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis  /  Transverse myelitis  /  Encephalitis  /  Myelitis  /  Encephalomyelitis  /  Meningoencephalitis  /  Meningitis  /  Encephalopathy  /  Convulsions  /  Seizures  /  Stroke  /  Narcolepsy  /  Cataplexy  /  Anaphylaxis  /  Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)  /  Myocarditis  /  Pericarditis  /  Autoimmune disease  /  Death  /  Pregnancy: Birth outcomes  /  Other acute demyelinating diseases  /  Non-anaphylactic allergy reactions  /  Thromocytopenia  /  Disseminated intravascular coagulation  /  Venous thromboembolism  /  Arthritis  /  Arthralgia  /  Joint pain  /  Kawaski disease  /  Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children  /  Vaccine enhanced disease.

"You aren't necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine.  But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed.  They're all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can't get more serious than death.  And if you are mad enough to have the vaccine then you and your doctor should keep a look out for the symptoms of all the diseases on the FDA's list.  Your government won't tell you about these dangers - they don't believe in fully informed consent as far as vaccines are concerned.  Indeed, most governments are now doing everything they can to ensure that all criticisms of vaccines are banned.  Depending on where you live it is, or soon will be, illegal even to mention that vaccines might not always work or might make you ill" [source].

 

Deaths in Care Homes Post-Vaccination

"[D]espite strict adherence to the government's Covid protection arrangements, and diligent care work in general, it now emerges that elderly people who remained free of Covid for many weeks and months, became Covid positive following vaccinations. A pattern that was also to affect hardworking staff, who until then, had been clear of the illness.  Significantly, this pattern was being seen by managers across the country's care system, and sickness amongst staff of course placed both the care system itself, and those staff still working, under greatly increased pressure.

"Our whistleblower stresses that far from being one or two odd cases, there was a 'dramatic increase' in Covid outbreaks after vaccinations. Asked if this related to one particular, or all of the three vaccines, they stated that they did not have precise information this, but believed the Pfizer vaccine was the most likely culprit.  Moreover, there was 'huge confusion in Covid testing and the reliability of results.'  The testing policy and results such as they are, were described as an 'ever changing landscape', in which little confidence could be placed.

"Questioned as to the route by which these observations and concerns could be passed into official professional channels, the whistleblower commented that whether the reporting channel was the CQC or the Professional Care body, there was a reluctance to hear bad news about the Covid 19 and vaccination policy as a whole. To the point [that] the system which should have received and acted upon concerns, was described as having 'tin ears.'  It did not want to hear and would not hear.

"The whistleblower also added that 'increasingly social care provision was no longer a question of the application of appropriate professional care decided upon by the carer themselves, but rather professional social carers were now treated as an "Agent of the State" to follow guidelines and procedures.'  As we see Covid 19 deaths amongst the elderly increasing, with further mortality increases (for whatever reason) post vaccination, the picture provided by this individual of some 30 years professional care experience at high management level, is deeply worrying.

"Vulnerable elderly people are becoming sick and are dying, their hard pressed carers are also becoming sick, and yet to speak out brings indifference at best, and real threats to the whistleblower's job at worst.  What is really going on in the care system around vulnerable elderly people? How has the UK care system come to this troubled state?..." [source].

 

What is Covid-19?

"Covid-19 is supposedly a pneumonia as a complication of SARS-COV-2, but ...

  • For most people, Covid-19 is a mild illness which is never confirmed as being due to SARS-COV-2, but the perception of reality is created by official general prognosis,
  • A developed SARS-COV-2 infection could be flu, or even a bacterial infection, and Covid-19, or the pneumonia associated with it, would in fact arise as a complication due to these other causations,
  • Pneumonia or severe respiratory complications can occur from a treatment for cancer - which incriminates other pre-existing conditions in combination with their medical treatments,
  • Meanwhile, quite astonishingly, there is no acknowledgement of what might be true Covid-19, which is an infection of the lungs related to the interaction between SARS-COV/SARS-COV-2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) that is promoted in treatment by prescribed drugs.

"[T]he UK Government's reaction to Covid-19 has been way beyond anything anyone could call proportional. It has been unnecessarily, grotesquely exaggerated, and pointlessly damaging" [source].

 

Coronavirus Act: What Are We Consenting To?

"In the UK, it is worth recapping what it is we are consenting to with the Coronavirus Act:

  • We consent to increased State surveillance of ourselves and our family;
  • We are happy that we could be detained, without charge, because some state official suspects, or claims they suspect, we may be infected;
  • It is fine with us that we or our loved ones can be sectioned under the Mental Health Act on the recommendation of a single doctor and neither we nor they need to have the protection of a second opinion we are locked up;
  • We accept that the state can retain our biometric data and fingerprints for an extended period;
  • We consent that jury trials are a bit of an anachronism and Judges can hear more evidence by video or even audio link;
  • We think it's fine that the evidence required, and processes undertaken, to determine and record our or our loved ones' deaths can be eroded to the point where they can be registered by people with no medical or legal expertise at all;
  • We don't think the NHS needs to adhere to practice standards or bother with assessing the needs of some patients, especially older people;
  • We are also fine with the complete suspension of democracy in Britain;
  • We accept all of this based upon a unique subset of scientific opinion which, contrary t every known scientific principle, can never be questioned;
  • We agree with the MSM that people who question any aspect of the stories they tell us are dangerous because these people just don't care if their own loved ones die. Only true believers care about their families;
  • We also accept the need for the State to invest considerable resources creating counter disinformation units whose purpose is to censor anything and everything which questions our firmly held beliefs. The beliefs informed by many of the same people doing the censoring..." [source].

 

Bayith Articles on C19

Concerning Coronavirus Vaccines  (Dec 2020 / Jan 2021)   |   Covid-19 Vaccines: As in the Days of Noah  (Nov 2020)

A Bit of Dirt...  (Nov 2020)   |   Rules Are Rules!  (Sept 2020)   |   Why I Don't Wear A Face-Mask  (Aug 2020)

Coming Out of Lockdown - Part Two: Hugs  (May 2020)   |   Coming Out of Lockdown - Part One: Rebuilding Our Immune Systems  (May 2020)

Wake Up, Folks...  (May 2020)   |   Our Place of Safety  (April 2020)

 

 

 

"He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in Him will I trust.
Surely He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust: His truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday ...
He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways ...
he shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble ... and show him my salvation"
(Psalm 91)

 

 

 

Please note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any periodicals to which they may contribute, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.

© Elizabeth McDonald     https://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk