Social
Engineering: Cultural Marxism / Frankfurt School / Leftism, et al
"You
can't make Socialists out of individualists - children who know how to
think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which
is coming, where everyone is interdependent"
[John Dewey, Fabian
Socialist founder of public education in America, quoted in Gena Suarez,
What About Public School?].
"[M]oney went to promote John Dewey, Marxism, a
One-World-Government agenda, and Socialism. The foundations (principally
the Rockefeller and Carnegie) stimulated two-thirds of the total
endowment funding of all institutions of higher learning in America
during the first third of [the] 20th century"
[source].
"Give me four years to
teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.
Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever"
[Vladimir Lenin, quoted at:
source].
"Even the famous Marxist
Theoretician Antonio Gramsci ... was a deep opponent of
'progressive' educational methods. He wrote: 'the most
paradoxical aspect is that this new type of school is advocated as
being democratic, while in fact it is designed not merely to
perpetuate social differences, but to crystallise them.' He
rightly saw that 'progressive' methods were no help to the poor"
[source].
"A small quote from the
past that helps explain the Leftist dominance of education: 'When an
opponent says, "I will not come over to your side," I calmly say,
"Your child belongs to us already. You will pass on. Your
descendents, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time,
they will know nothing else but this new community.".' Quote
from Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 6th November 1933" [source].
"Nearly
three-quarters of faculty members of U.S. colleges and universities
describe themselves as liberals, and at elite schools, the proportion is
87 percent (7/05 Baptist Watchman). ... Business Week in
1981 said over 10,000 Marxist professors were teaching in U.S. colleges
and universities"
[The
Calvary Contender, Sept-Oct 2005].
"Under Labour, poor
standards in the classroom were masked by an Ofsted inspection
regime which focused on 'healthy pupil lifestyles' and the way a
school 'promotes equal opportunity'. To his great credit, Michael
Gove swept away this ludicrous, politically-correct system,
replacing 27 indicators with just four - teaching quality, grades,
leadership, and behaviour and safety. The results, revealed
yesterday, are shocking - with the rule changes leading to an
instant doubling in the number of 'inadequate' schools. Overall,
four out of ten are now rated satisfactory or worse. What a damning
indictment of the way Labour placed its obsession with social
engineering before educating children"
[Comment, Daily Mail,
15 September 2012].
"Conservatives have long
bemoaned liberal dominance in education from the universities on
down, but we haven't done anything about it. Marxist intellectuals
realized decades ago that the eventual victory of socialism would be
assured if leftists dominated the educational system and used their
influence to push a leftist worldview. The power of their 'long
march' through the cultural institutions was that it was not
necessary for students to consciously convert to socialist thinking;
generation after generation would simply be gradually immersed in
the assumptions and dogmas of the left"
[source].
"Indoctrinate them young
and they become putty in the hands of the Fabians - but for the
children's own good of course, let's not forget to accompany this
social engineering exercise with the stock claim the elite use to
excuse the evil they perpetrate"
[comment at
source].
"Children need to be raised again with a sense of Englishness, for
far too long students throughout the schooling system have been
instilled with cultural Marxism. We have reached a point now where
it has become second nature for young adults to repeat unthinking
Left-wing ideology that has been forced upon them by Marxist
teachers. Anti-Englishness, State intervention, high-taxation,
antagonisms towards the successful, mass immigration,
multiculturalism, preference for the Other - are now seen to be
good, right things, as they have been taught these things in
schools" / "After 30 years of politically
motivated National Curriculum, I would like to see the end of any
party dogma dictating how our children are brainwashed"
[comments at
source].
"Britain really is two
nations now - the pre-1960s patriotic, Christian moral conservative
one, and the post-1960s omnisexual, multicultural liberal one. The
annual Social Attitudes survey does not show people changing their
minds. Very few do, as it's rather difficult. It shows that younger
people have completely different views from their elders on almost
every major issue of life. So at some point - and this must be the
first time this has happened in history - the older generation
stopped being able to pass on their values to their own children.
How was this done? Who was responsible? Was it an accident? My own
view is that it was deliberate and sustained. Could it now be
reversed? I rather doubt it"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday,
15 September 2013].
"Did the schools ever
consult us on whether we wanted our children's heads to be
filled with ... politically correct bilge? After 25 years' ongoing
exposure to this nonsense, I suppose I should be used to it by now.
My elder son's headmaster explaining to me airily how it just wasn't
the modern way to punish children for not doing their homework; my
daughter coming home with the news that her primary teacher had
advised her to 'go veggie' for a week; my younger boy being co-opted
into some grisly global sustainability club, so that his school
could win more eco-star ratings from an EU-sponsored green scheme.
Such indoctrination never fails to irritate. More than that though,
I am genuinely terrified about the kind of havoc these brainwashed
mini-revolutionaries may wreak in the future. Already we're getting
an indication of a new culture across our universities that brooks
no dissent against a politically correct view of history, literature
and sexuality" [source].
"Who knows whether The
Blob can ever be defeated: at present they are winning an
ideological war that has been raging for years between two violently
opposed camps. One side believes in discipline, uniforms,
intellectual rigour, competitiveness and old-fashioned subjects like
Latin - and, most importantly, freedom of expression that eschews
politically correctness. The other side sees all this tradition as
the enemy of a future where everyone is equal, all shall have prizes
and, more cynically, everyone should embrace the glorious new order
of the enlightened, progressive Left. If the latter sounds like a
form of cultural Marxism, that's effectively what it is"
[source].
The State as Parent
"The philosopher John
Stuart Mill ... linked his call for the compulsory schooling of
children to his distrust of parental competence. He believed that
state-sponsored formal education might free children from the
'uncultivated' influence of their parents. He asserted that since
'the uncultivated cannot be competent judges of cultivation', they
needed the support of enlightened educators to socialise their
children. This lack of confidence in parents' capacity to develop
their children led many nineteenth-century reformers to view formal
education as the principle institution of socialisation. In the
early twentieth century, educators and child experts sought to
bypass parental authority through assuming more and more
responsibility for the socialisation of young people. And since the
1990s, the once-implicit questioning of the ability of parents to
socialise their children has become explicit, and increasingly
strident" [source].
"Control over people
requires quality and freedom to be discarded and sacrificed on
behalf of compulsory indoctrination. For a state possessed by
socialism, it does not matter if schoolchildren are not learning to
read and write satisfactorily. What matters is to turn away children
from parental sphere, authority and values in order to indoctrinate
them directly into the state interests" [Julio Severo,
quoted at
source].
"[Y]ou have to
understand that in LibLabCon Britain, children don't belong to their
parents. Children belong to the state, just like in the Soviet Union
and other places east of the Vistula. The parents belong to the
state too, so it's their duty to work and be tax-slaves to pay for
all those vanity projects our rulers fund from that tax, and to have
no time to give to their children, so that those children can be
indoctrinated by the state into being the compliant little
tax-slaves of the future"
[comment at
source].
Egalitarianism
"My first experience of
political correctness came in 1965. ... One morning during assembly
at Luton Grammar School, the Headmaster coolly announced that for
'political reasons', the Grammar School was to close and was to
become a Sixth Form College. As from the start of the next school
year, all pupils would have to attend their local neighbourhood
comprehensive. ... ever since I could remember, teachers and parents
had been emphasising the importance of working hard and passing the
11+ which was the first step to getting a good education which would
help you through life. ... On further investigation, I found out
what the 'political reasons' were that the Headmaster had briefly
alluded to. Apparently the local labour council had decided that
streaming in education was 'elitist' and if a first class education
was not available to all then, unfortunately all would have to
settle for a second class education. This is a clear example of how
PC always reduces standards"
[source].
"I ought to rejoice at
the impending departure of the terrifyingly political-correctness
enthusiast Dame Suzi Leather, from the Charity Commission. Her nasty
chivvying of independent schools was hypocritical (she went to one,
and sent her daughter to one) and destructive. However, the
supposedly conservative Education Secretary Michael Gove has taken
over her role as Commissar for Moronic Equality. Left-wingers all
over Britain are still fawning and drooling over a speech that Mr
Gove made recently in which he complained about private-school
dominance of the professions, but failed to mention that this was
caused by the destruction of state grammar schools by Tory and
Labour governments" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 20 May
2012].
"Yet again the top
universities are accused of being unfair to state school pupils.
This is upside down. The state schools are being unfair to their
pupils, by refusing to select on ability, by insisting on
watered-down comprehensive schooling and by failing to tell the
young that they need to take the tougher A-levels to get into the
top colleges. Why should good universities lower their standards to
indulge this stupidity?" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 31
March 2013].
National Education
Association
"The NEA and similar
unions worldwide believe that children should be thoroughly
indoctrinated with Green/Left, feminist/homosexual ideology but the
'3 Rs' are something that kids should just be allowed to 'discover'"
[source].
General Teaching Council
"The ludicrous and
sinister General Teaching Council will soon doubtless be ensuring
that all teachers spout the proper views on 'Equality and Diversity'
- words that just happen to appear prominently in its PC new 'Draft
Code' shortly to be imposed after the usual charade of consultation.
I suspect that its real purpose is to be the educational branch of
the Thought Police. To get the measure of this body, compare and
contrast two cases that have come before it. First, look at its
treatment of a teacher who admitted using crack cocaine and falling
asleep in lessons. William Horseman will be allowed to carry on
teaching children - maybe yours - though he will be 'monitored'.
Then recall what happened when an experienced former teacher, Angela
Mason, went undercover to record the true extent of disruption and
disorder in our classrooms, so doing the country an important
service. She was suspended by the GTC for a year. So snorting crack
cocaine gets you monitored. Telling the truth about schools gets you
suspended. If you have ever wondered what the real priorities of our
new Establishment are, this should give you a pretty good clue"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 21 February 2009].
National Union of Teachers
"An article in
Thursday's Mail by Robert Peal, a brilliant Cambridge graduate who
taught history in a state school, was an alarming expose of the dire
conditions in parts of our state education system. His new book,
Progressively Worse, shows the damage wreaked on children by
trendy educationists over many decades, leading to generations
leaving school illiterate, innumerate and lacking in intellectual
curiosity. Worse still, the minority of children who want to stretch
their brains stand almost no chance of doing so. And yet, as we saw
this week at the National Union of Teachers' annual conference -
which looks increasingly like a Monty Python sketch about the Soviet
bloc - a hardcore of Leftist teachers seem intent on destroying
education standards. Particularly worrying is their demented and
irrational [sic] hatred of Education Secretary Michael Gove.
Thankfully, there is talk of forming an alternative union to oppose
the shamefully destructive NUT. I hope it succeeds"
[Simon Heffer,
Daily Mail, 26 April 2014].
Teachers' Training Colleges
"Three, or possibly
four, cheers for Michael Gove. Not only has he insisted - to the
outrage of the teaching unions - that the children in primary
schools should be taught times tables and foreign languages, but he
has also proposed training teachers on the job in good schools
rather than in Marxist-dominated colleges. It is precisely because
those colleges are so useless that the teachers they produce are
often incapable of teaching to a high standard. So when teachers
protest about standards being raised, it is not because they fear
for the children, but for themselves. They know they will be found
out" [Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 16 June 2012].
"This week's shocking
revelation that British teenagers have dropped out of the top 20
international rankings in maths, science and reading is a
devastating indictment of the education policies of the last Labour
government. But it also offers a golden opportunity to Education
Secretary Michael Gove to shake up the teaching profession. He
should end the requirement for state school teachers to have a
teaching qualification and let them learn on the job instead. And
this would mean they escape the Marxist influences of so many
teacher training colleges" [Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 07
December 2013].
Universities
"Yet again the top
universities are accused of being unfair to state school pupils.
This is upside down. The state schools are being unfair to their
pupils, by refusing to select on ability, by insisting on
watered-down comprehensive schooling and by failing to tell the
young that they need to take the tougher A-levels to get into the
top colleges. Why should good universities lower their standards to
indulge this stupidity?" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 31
March 2013].
"Progressiveness is the
cancer of the West. It's utterly destroying the rigor of academia
and turning universities into cathedrals of anti-intellectualism,
devoid of actual progress in desperate maintenance of the
politically-correct status-quo that the latest molly-coddled
generation cannot stand to have challenged"
[comment at
source].
Snowflakes:
"[W]e have a mega-teen
culture which the entire world orbits around, and we have millions
of adults who are stuck in perpetual adolescence, seeking to remain
teens. Coupled with all this is the out-of-control offence industry
which says we have a fundamental right to never be offended, never
to feel bad, and never to have our feelings hurt. That has resulted
in a generation of wilted dandelions and precious pansies. A bunch
of spoiled brats ... coddled, spoiled narcissists"
[source].
"The term 'generation
snowflake' started in America. Parents cherished their offspring as
'precious little snowflakes', each alike but unique, or 'everyone is
special' ... When those smothered infants grew into adults they were
lampooned by the same parental generation for melting at any small
amount of difficulty. 'Snowflake' is just a fancy word for 'drip'"
[quoted at
source].
"These students 'take
offence' to the point where they can only reach their full potential
by existing in an echo chamber, a utopia that only the tax payer can
provide for - and things like these 'cry ins' are 'rights' at
institutions of higher learning"
[comment at
source].
"Thank Freud and Jung and the
Christians who 'incorporated' these insights from God-rejecting
immoral intellectuals into their own true views of man which came
from a holy God. Grieve for these adult kinds who cannot see what
they have lost because of the faithlessness they have inherited.
Only the gospel which sanctifies will heal the hurt of the daughter
of My people says the Lord" [comment at
source].
"[T]his was all prophesied. The
scriptures tell us about the lack of respect [for] and input from
fathers and the general disrespect for men (Isaiah 3:12). This
generation suffers from a completely irrational hatred of anything
'paternalistic'. See also Malachi 4:6 and Luke 1:17"
[comment
at
source].
Safe Spaces:
"Amid all the hoo-hah
about students banning speakers they disagree with, what really gets
on my nerves is the way some universities have taken to dedicating
rooms as a 'safe space' for them to retreat to if a lecture becomes
too challenging. They have things like calming music, colouring
books and Play-doh to help the poor mites recover. Honestly!
Universities shouldn't be safe spaces. They should be unsafe spaces,
where every idea or thought is challenged. There should be no no-go
areas, nothing off limits. If we can't question anything and
everything in a university, where on earth can we?"
[Dr. Max,
Daily Mail, 05 December 2015].
"Universities that
promote 'safe spaces' are not worthy of the hefty annual tuition and
fees that they demand from students and their parents. My alma
mater, Rutgers University, is apparently partaking in this
politically correct madness, perhaps the next time Rutgers asks for
a donation, I'll tell them that my money is locked in a 'safe space'
[source].
"Here's a reality check
for college students who think they're entitled to avoiding
'distressing viewpoints'. If given the chance, as ISIS or al Qaeda
terrorist would strap in an explosive belt and 'bombard' your 'safe
space' without hesitation. Make no mistake: radical Islamic
terrorists want to kill you and destroy everything that you stand
for. Do you think I'm exaggerating? ... The fact that terrorists are
also killing innocent Americans inside our very homeland makes the
idea of retreating to 'safe spaces' even more of a joke ... Don't
most young people understand what is at stake?"
[source].
"I am sick and tired of
hearing about 'safe spaces' here at home while brave U.S. troops are
dying abroad. ... Instead of whining and retreating to 'safe
spaces', wouldn't it be nice if more college students dedicated some
of their time, energy and intellect to supporting the men and women
of our military community? After all, they are the ones fighting to
keep ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists out of your imaginary 'safe
spaces'. Nobody cares about your feelings, millennials. It's time to
grow up and be thankful for your freedom, which generations of brave
Americans have fought to preserve. Liberty is precious. Don't waste
it by avoiding reality" [source].
Trigger Warnings:
"And by the way, if a
lecturer using a word like 'violate' upsets you - because it's
supposedly a 'trigger word' that might make you think about rape - I
doubt that's because you're the victim of some awful psychological
trauma. It's probably because you're a wally"
[Dr. Max, Daily
Mail, 05 December 2015].
See also Political
Correctness: Identity Politics
here and
here
See also Political
Correctness: Marriage, Family, Children
here and
here
English
"Successive governments
have let educational standards slide dramatically rather than take
on the left wing dogma that has invaded the classroom. Apparently
teachers mustn't teach anymore as this is 'oppressive' and their
function now is to be like a helpful friend to the pupils who will
only learn what they want to! Rules, such as grammar apparently
'stifle the child's creativity and oppress them'. But common sense
reveals that the reverse is actually true. Our language is a common
medium through which we all communicate and to express ourselves
clearly and unambiguously we therefore need a common structure.
Programming a computer is the same - to get the desired result we
have to stick to a syntax that the processor understands other wise
the result will be a crash! When the child leaves school unable to
read or write properly and applies for a job, the result is also a
crash that leads to a life doing unskilled jobs or on the dole. So
rather than oppressing the child, grammar actually liberates the
child to be a free spirit armed with the means to make their own way
in life [EMcD: precisely the reason, of course, that
the PC change agents don't want schools soundly educating our
children!]" [source].
"'The rot is absolute',
says [a] former state school teacher, ' ... In literacy, there was
very little focus on grammar or spelling'"
[source].
History and Revisionism
"Ask an English child of
2011 about the iconic dates of English history such as Hastings,
Blenheim and Waterloo and your chances of getting a correct answer
are very small. Quiz them on who was Alfred the Great or ask them to
describe the outcome of the Spanish Armada and the odds are that you
will be met with blank stares. Pose a question relating to English
geography such as the position of the Chilterns or the course of the
Severn and a shrug of the shoulders is the likely outcome. Mention a
Shakespeare play or a Dickens novel and childish eyes are wont to
roll. Sadly, the modern English child is more likely to be able to
tell a questioner about the Muslim festival of Ramadan than relate
the story of Easter. They will know more of the geography of Africa
(if they know any geography at all) than of England. On the rare
occasions when they are told about England's history, it will only
be in the context of the country's 'evil' past, with the Atlantic
slave trade elevated to the status of the ultimate act of historical
immorality and the Empire recounted as an unrelieved tale of the
exploitation of native peoples. The upshot is that we have several
generations of English children who have commonly left school with
next to no meaningful knowledge of their own history and higher
culture. That applies not only to those who depart education with a
basic education at the age of 16, but even those who go on to
university. Worse, their education is designed to leave them with,
at best, a belief that thy have nothing to be proud of because they
are English, and, at worst, that they should be thoroughly ashamed
of the fact that they are English"
[source].
"English history and
culture ceased to be taught in schools in any meaningful way from
[the 70s and 80s] and the history of Britain and England was only
discussed in order to constantly denigrate it for being oppressive,
e.g. the transatlantic slave trade and colonialism are always
promoted by left-wing teachers as examples of British history and
how imperialistic and racist it is. This has created ethnic 'victim
groups' in society who express an antagonism for the host culture,
and it has damaged our young children who grow up with a sense of
historic guilt and self-loathing for their country. Our children
spend the best part of their early education feeling that they have
no sense of place or history, no culture to be proud of as the
cultures of those around them are promoted and celebrated and their
own denigrated. To disinherit children of their heritage is one of
the greatest crimes committed by the liberal/left elite in this
country and surely one day they will be held accountable for this"
[source].
"The true history of England is forever set in stone, ready and
waiting to be found by those that seek it out. As long as there is
left standing one true Englishman, holding steady and unwavering to
the ever fixed mark. Then the ebb and flow of the tempest will froth
and rage in vain" [comment at
source].
"In any country
undergoing political change, school history is deeply controversial.
It shapes the next generation's views and thoughts for the rest of
their lives. The battle over what should be in the history
curriculum has now raged for more than 50 years, and most intensely
since the Schools Council History Project of 1974, which ditched
knowledge in favour of empathy. Many teachers have grown up with the
vaguest knowledge of our national past, and history has been pushed
to the edge of the curriculum. Good luck to Michael Gove in his
battle to restore and reform it, but the task may be bigger than he
thinks" [Mail on Sunday Comment, 30 December 2012].
"Having endured the
'education' system for the past 13 years I can safely say I have
been taught more about Black Rights movements in the US than My own
history of MY ancestors and MY country. Whenever any history of a
British sort is taught it is done so with disdain and a sort of
bitter resentment, as if we need to be ashamed of it. I realised
this and have sought to educate myself outside of school, but many
have taken in this indoctrination as truth and have been brainwashed
into accepting the foolish left-wing concepts of Multi-culturalism
and 'diversity'. It's about time things changed, but I fear it's too
late. I am 17. I fear by the time I see my 30s my country will no
longer be British. How is that right?" / "It
would be impossible to teach the abolition of slavery without
William Wilberforce" / "NuLabour socially engineered British success out of
British history lessons and replaced it with left wing brainwashing.
For over a decade cultural awareness, immersion days, dumbing down
and PC correctness [sic] put the British people second in the
classroom. In addition, the left wing BBC brainwashed the children
when they were not at school" / "So glad the
force feeding of Politically Correct figures in schools is to end.
... The tosh fed to school children recently would have us believe
that we were 'saved' from being nasty Britis [sic] by these people.
Our native British ancestors have contributed massively and
positively to the modern world. Modern history as told in schools
presently diminishes our national identity and achievements"
[comments at
source].
"'The rot is absolute',
says [a] former state school teacher, ' ... For history, we'd use a
textbook with made-up quotes from historical figures, telling us how
bad the British Empire was.' The former teacher is referring
to a book, aimed at 11 to 14-year-olds and still widely in use,
called Minds and Machines, where dead white European men such as
British colonialist Cecil Rhodes and the Duke of Wellington are
reviled. Incredibly, Wellington is credited with being partly to
blame for the Peterloo massacre - when several people died in
Manchester in 1819 after cavalry troops charged crowds calling for
government reform - but not with his victory at Waterloo, which
saved Europe from Napoleon's brutal military hegemony"
[source].
Geography
"'The rot is absolute',
says [a] former state school teacher, ' ... Geography was about
saving rainforests, recycling and instilling guilt about how humans
are ruing the Earth'"
[source].
Sex Education
"What exactly, does one
tell a five year old about sex?" / "That
it's how mummy and daddy make babies. Just how parents managed for
generations" / "Stay away from left wing
teachers?" / "[T]his is classic Frankfurt
School Cultural Marxism, Lukacs did this in Hungary" /
"Innocence is mocked, that's the problem. Innocence should be a
virtue" / "We all know there is an agenda
here. Certain people in government want to make sure that the first
time children learn anything about sex it won't just be about
male+female, and it won't just be about 'making babies' - which is
where most parents start. And that's why parents are not to be
trusted with sex education" / "I suspect
that if parents are 'crying out for ' anything at all it is an end
to the politically correct way of teaching that passes for sex
education in schools at the moment"
[comments at
source].
"'When I get married -
whether it's to a man or a woman...' my 11-year-old niece told her
grandpa the other day. But I don't think she thinks she's a budding
lesbian (would she even know at that age?). It's just the way she
has been taught to think at her impeccably right-on school in the
People's Republic of Brighton"
[source].
"It is rather
interesting that Jeremy Corbyn recently proposed that children
should be introduced to studies of homosexuals who have contributed
to society. Among these he noted Oscar Wilde, a known paedophile.
The Left's indoctrination programme extends far and wide in society
and it is rather unfortunate that their key target [is] primary
school children from 3 years onwards. Children who step out of line
in the indoctrination programmed, who disagree with the Party line
are deemed 'homophobic' and placed on a suitable list for
re-education" [comment at
source].
MultiCulturalism / Equality and Diversity / Racism
"The ludicrous and
sinister General Teaching Council will soon doubtless be ensuring
that all teachers spout the proper views on 'Equality and Diversity'
- words that just happen to appear prominently in its PC new 'Draft
Code' shortly to be imposed after the usual charade of consultation.
I suspect that its real purpose is to be the educational branch of
the Thought Police. To get the measure of this body, compare and
contrast two cases that have come before it. First, look at its
treatment of a teacher who admitted using crack cocaine and falling
asleep in lessons. William Horseman will be allowed to carry on
teaching children - maybe yours - though he will be 'monitored'.
Then recall what happened when an experienced former teacher, Angela
Mason, went undercover to record the true extent of disruption and
disorder in our classrooms, so doing the country an important
service. She was suspended by the GTC for a year. So snorting crack
cocaine gets you monitored. Telling the truth about schools gets you
suspended. If you have ever wondered what the real priorities of our
new Establishment are, this should give you a pretty good clue"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 21 February 2009].
"'Diversity missionaries'
are being sent into [UK state] schools to teach children about bigotry,
while teachers have to monitor incidents of alleged racial harassment.
Those schools that don't report any cases are told to put up posters
raising awareness of racism. So if their pupils aren't aware of
what bigotry is, they soon will be. Yet another pathetic example
of an insidious grievance industry seeking out intolerance where there
is none" [Amanda Platell, Daily Mail, 31 October 2009].
"Having endured the
'education' system for the past 13 years I can safely say I have
been taught more about Black Rights movements in the US than My own
history of MY ancestors and MY country. Whenever any history of a
British sort is taught it is done so with disdain and a sort of
bitter resentment, as if we need to be ashamed of it. I realised
this and have sought to educate myself outside of school, but many
have taken in this indoctrination as truth and have been brainwashed
into accepting the foolish left-wing concepts of Multi-culturalism
and 'diversity'. It's about time things changed, but I fear it's too
late. I am 17. I fear by the time I see my 30s my country will no
longer be British. How is that right?"
[comment at
source].
"[My niece's] dad had wanted to know why when she said 'Mohammed',
she automatically added the phase 'Peace Be Upon Him'. 'Oh,
it's what we're taught we have to say in RE' [at an overwhelmingly
white, Christian state school in Worcester], my niece replied"
[source].
KCL, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, July 2017
Replacing
busts of white benefactors/leading academics with ones of ethnic
minorities
"If you are studying to
become a psychiatrist and a marble bust of an old man is enough to
make you feel intimidated, can I suggest that working in psychiatry
is maybe not the best career option for you"
[comment at
source].
"Why are people who find
paintings 'intimidating' at university in the first place? Shouldn't
they be in a nursery school?" [comment at
source].
"Also concerning is the
intellectual confusions in 'race', 'ethnicity,' 'culture' conflated
together. Understandable from a sixth former, not impressive from a
learned institution" [comment at
source].
"With widespread
awareness of phobias amongst students this could be a case of
pogonophobia or fear of beards. Unfortunately, it is much more
likely to be a case of progressive anti-colonialist racism which
attempts to wipe white men from history. Yesterday Nazi students
burned books, today progressive students remove statues"
[source].
"It is too easy to
characterise this as over-sensitive students making demands and
weak-kneed administrators crumbling. Disturbingly, there is a
pattern of cultural imperialism emerging in our universities, not
only from students but also from the faculties who are radicalising
them. These a-historical, intolerant feminist and anti-colonial
attitudes had to come from somewhere"
[source].
"Once-foundational
liberal values, free speech and the propagation of divergent views
are seen as dangerous by many students today. University staff who
should be trying to expand student minds and encouraging them to
take intellectual risks, instead give them full support in their
demands for safe spaces where they might be sheltered from hearing
an alternative viewpoint" [source].
"Kings was a Christian
foundation with a strong theological faculty and seminary. The
seminary has gone and the Dean is reduced to a figurehead.
University College was the secularist opposite number of King's"
[comment at
source].
"My daughter tells me
that Tutu has already been banished from the King's 'Wall of BAME';
as his black skin didn't sufficiently compensate for his bishopric.
Carey has also been banished form the alumnae to be celebrated -
'white' 'male' and 'Archbishop' was bad enough, but opposition to
same-sex marriage sealed his fate"
[comment at
source].
"[These] 'liberals' ...
are the descendant of Gramsci and know full well what they are doing
- trying to wipe Western, Christian, freedom-loving, 'capitalism'
off the map" [comment at
source].
"One of the most stupid
things about the cultural-Marxists is that they rant on about the
'patriarchy' whilst following the teachings of 'pale, stale, males'
(i.e. light-skinned, normal, men) such as Descartes, Rousseau, Marx,
Nietzsche, Freud, and Foucault. The cry of the post-modernists etc
is against 'Western Philosophy' whilst they themselves are a branch
of Western philosophy and the current dominate school. Do they
really think their philosophy could have emerged from Confucianism?
They are a Western philosophical heresy which has gained power over
the entire West, they rail against the 'bourgeoisie' whilst they
themselves are the 'bourgeoisie', and an ill-educated and
totalitarian one at that" [comment at
source].
"There are however, some
historical, white, bearded men who should earn our opprobrium...
Marx, Engels, Trotsky, and Lenin" / "If
Kings College want to commission a bust or painting of Thomas Sowell
then I would chip in for that" / "And how
safe is the Faraday memorial at Elephant & Castle. hardly
representative of the 'rich diversity' in those surroundings today.
Dickens along Kennington lane too. Down with these white
oppressors!" / "I passed under Henry
Maudsley's bust this morning, and survived. No fork of lightening
emitted from his bronze beard. A solid, reassuring presence while
the snowflakes melt beneath him. These students (and the
'progressive' scholars who lead them) need to learn some history
before they criticise. All courses should contain a historical
component, so that these 'present good, past bad' ideas are
challenged" [comments at
source].
"'Your rights end where
my feelings begin'. I don't give a tuppenny damn about the feelings
of effnics ... Please remember that I am entitled to my own homeland
too" [comment at
source].
"Has it ever occurred to
these do-gooders that their actions are actually condescending to
racial minorities? With the exception of those on the left, many of
us are NOT insulted or even remotely interested in the skin colour
of those who founded King's College. The purpose of attending
university is to get an education, and we should be grateful to
Britain's historic Christian culture that these universities exist.
This notion of being embarrassed about English culture is
ridiculous. As a nation, Britain is more diverse, but the founders
are white because the English are an ethnic group who happen to be
white. So what? I thought the whole point was to get AWAY from using
skin colour to define people? Surely? Or did I miss the memo?"
[comment at
source].
"Tony Blair believed
that British history began in 1987 which was a fair and reasonable
means of ensuring that people from other cultures didn't feel
excluded when they came here to recreate their homelands under more
congenial economic and social circumstances invented by white
people. But King's College is the proof that we haven't done enough.
Nothing can be done yet about the prevalence of legacy white faces
around them but making 1987 a cultural year zero gives immigrants a
full and equal stake in the new improved but still improvable
British society. An exception must be made for the history of
colonial crime of which pre-enlightened Britain was the worst
offender the world has ever known. Whites must never be allowed to
forget their guilt. But the other stuff such as Magna Carta, the
Reformation, the long struggle for parliamentary democracy, the
Great Revolution of 1688, the establishment of constitutional law
... universal education ... the arts of music, literature and
painting, human rights including freedom of expression - all this
belongs to an obsolete and heavily mythologised past which was
exclusively white and stolen at will and without attribution form
the great non-white cultures which preceded it and made it possible.
Rip these bearded hypocrites from the walls of King's and tear up
their racist, supremacist so-called principles. They don't belong to
history; they are an affront to history. Signed: Dave Spart"
[comment at
source] :-)
"The historian Will
Durant wrote: 'The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the
bloodiest story in history'. The Bahmani Sultans, a third rank
dynasty, alone made it a point of slaughtering 100,000 Hindus a day
when they felt like it. The French historian Braudel wrote: 'the
Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror.
Cruelty was the norm - burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or
impalements, inventive tortures'. Those who were not massacred were
raped and enslaved in huge numbers. The statistician Lal, cited in
Khan p216, estimates that between 60-80 millions died at the hands
of Muslim invaders. Compared to this, British colonial rule was a
model of enlightenment and care which, as well as taking from India,
gave to India unity, the rule of law, a government less corrupt and
more efficient than it had ever had, either before or arguably
since, democracy, the English language, the basics of a modern state
and finally, independence" / "And India
still uses much of what we gave it. Yes, I'm proud of my country for
that" [comments at
source].
"It's very sad. But
there is a great deal of inconsistency in the position held by these
left-wing dogmas. Somehow, they manage to believe the following
simultaneously: (1) Appearing less English is good, because
this leads to more inclusiveness; (2) Appearing more English
is wrong, because it pressures ethnic minorities to abandon their
culture; (3) There are ethnic minorities in Britain, but there
is no dominant culture; (4) The dominant culture is exclusive,
but ethnic minorities should be happy to live in Britain. As
you can see, this is choc-full of contradictions. If one is a
MINORITY, then that means there is a dominant culture. In England,
that would be English culture. Furthermore, if they hold that ethnic
minorities should be proud of their ethnic background, then why are
they concerned about perceived offence caused to them by statutes of
Englishmen? Furthermore, if English culture was so offensive, surely
this would lead to FEWER ethnic minorities (like myself) living
here? Bottom line: if someone told me that my skin colour was
offending them, I would tell them something short and unrepeatable.
I don't dilute my own racial and ethnic background for other people,
and I don't expect others to do the same for me. That's absurd. The
whole point was supposed to be that we DON'T judge by these
characteristics. I happen to love English history and culture, which
is why I am proud to be British. That's why I live here. The fact
that the English as an ethnic group are white neither offends nor
interests me. If I was so offended by it, I could go and live
elsewhere" [comment at
source].
Environmentalism
"Nowhere, perhaps, is
the march of the Mind Police more evident than in the way virtually
the whole curriculum has been hijacked by environmental issues. A
popular revision guide for GCSE English gives this example of a
'boring' sentence that may receive 'zero marks': 'Global warming is
a bad thing'. And this as a 'much better sentence': 'Global
warming is a very serious and worrying issue.' Even foreign
languages are not immune. A Heinemann textbook for A-level French
invited pupils to study an open letter by a French environmentalist
warning schoolchildren that on global warming 'scientists are
unanimous', and 'never in the history of humanity have the dangers
been so great'" [source].
Critical Thinking
"Most parents and
teachers still believe that critical thinking refers to factual,
logical thinking. They have been misled. School fliers explain that
it means teaching students 'to think for themselves'. It actually
means the opposite; it's a psychological strategy for dismantling
old beliefs and values and instilling new ones by limiting factual
knowledge while encouraging myths, imagination, and group synthesis.
Since it trades the traditional broad knowledge base for selected
information that supports the new ideology, most students can easily
be manipulated towards the preplanned outcomes"
[source].
Homeschooling
The
following comments are from readers of the article:
Local Authorities Demand Snooping Powers to Crack Down on Unregistered
Faith Home Schoolers
"'It's not fair' exclaimed
the marxist dogooder, 'We have a god given monopoly on brainwashing'"
"There hasn't been religion
taught in public [state] schools in over 50 years. Maybe that's the
problem... All kids are taught nowadays is to pray to the false gods of
government" / "The government hates competition.
Stamp put freedom wherever you can, Councilmen and Women, stamp it out!"
/ "Meanwhile, the imams at mosques openly preach jihad
without the government batting an eyelid" /
"Fascism, plain and simple"
"The state wants to bombard
your kid with nonstop LGBT/diversity propaganda, and unwashed brains
pose a threat to the agenda. They're paranoid. If they don't intervene
now, your kid might grow up to be a cisgendered UKIP supporter. That's
unacceptable in the new progressive Britain - tantamount to a hate
crime. Your kid needs to learn to be a second class citizen in his own
institutions, he needs to learn how to be submissive while foreigners
bully him, and he can't do that from home" / "So
true - take a leaf from the South Africans 'education'. The white
children are now so convinced that they are 'privileged' that they spout
it forth without a second thought. It's horrific, especially considering
that everything there is heavily weighted in favour of black empowerment
only. Of course that is further justified by the 'whites are privileged'
brainwashing. This is probably already happening here [UK] but parents
should be aware of it as a cornerstone tactic towards creating
submission and self sacrifice"
"The evil doers want to
possess your children. Mind, body and soul" / To
be taught "the religion of atheism ... Despite denying God, the state
invariably acts as a God which must be worshiped. Human life becomes
nothing more than the soil in the ground to be trodden under foot if it
benefits the state" / "Yes, the government did a
great job of 'keeping an eye' on the children in Rotherham and the other
cities now, didn't they!"
"We are moving from Sweden
to England so my son can be home schooled. With very poor schooling in
Sweden completely swamped with immigrants my English special needs son
is in constant fear of death. I sincerely hope England doesn't go the
way of Sweden and ban home schooling altogether as it fears that
children might not receive their daily dose of LGBT SJW multicultural
liberal propaganda" / "Keep your head up ...
Ending up in a corner, back against the wall can be the trigger for
unleashing massive creativity" / "I know how bad
Swedish schools are. Most English state schools are terrible, I'm
afraid. Good luck with home schooling. Lots of excellent free resources
online"
"All good people want is to
be left alone by government to live their lives as they see fit. This is
their God given right should they be religious or not. The satanic
influenced tenth plank to the communist manifesto insists that
government has a right to forcibly take your children out of your home 5
days a week and to be reeducated away from a belief in God and the
family as the backbone of any worthwhile society and be brainwashed to
believe that unquestionable service to the almighty state and to those
that control it as the only [acceptable] goals in life. The conscience
that God has given us tells us otherwise. People the world over should
shield their children from these evil influences by any means necessary
or risk losing them. May God help us"
"One of the main arguments
of those who are hostile to homeschooling, as the article says, is
socialization. When socialization is done as a private matter it is a
good matter, but when it is done under the insistence of the state at
any level of government it means 'socialist-ization'. They say that
peers socialization at government schools is a good influence on
children yet [the] most dangerous place for youth is not on the city
streets, it is in the schools. Socialization at home with loving parents
remains the best influences on children for them to grow up to be good
members of society" / "Most Home Schoolers do
want their children to become part of wider society when they grow up -
they just don't want them brainwashed and indoctrinated by Mammonite
Multiculturalism in the formative years (0-7), or exposed to peer
pressure from Mammonite zombies and their 'smart' (hah hah) phones
between 7 and 21"
"Dear Mrs Wrongthink, The
'local council' (which is English for Stasi) will be coming round to
make sure that your children are playing with Mohammed, Mohammed and
Mohammed in their spare time, and that they are completely familiar with
Islam, understand about banned words, triggering and are not being
forced to conform to oppressive heterosexual gender concepts. Especially
if they conform naturally of their own free will, which is a clear
indication of parental negligence. Mr and Mrs Hussein will be your new
role models - Mr Hussein can take an extra wife, so better that you move
in with them. Their cousins (it's a very close family) are due to come
over to the UK just as soon as you are out of your house - Mr Hussein
has all the modern things because he doesn't work, so you can leave your
house as is. You won't even need to pack a bag - he has spare cloths
which will fit you. Your husband is going to prison. Yours Sincerely, Ms
K Marx (My pronouns are 'useful' and 'idiot')"
"Headline should read:
'Common Purpose leftist filth are worried that white Christian children
being home schooled will not be indoctrinated with the PCMC 'izslime is
the answer' mantra and will be able to think independently"
/ "What could possibly be illegal about a [Christian] faith
based school? Teaching the subjects necessary to eventually enter
College along with learning things the Government abandoned, Faith,
can't even begin to be a bad thing."
Quote from the article:
"Around 900 children are currently registered as EHE [elective home
education] in Birmingham, a city of 1.1 million people. 'Those numbers
have been growing in the last couple of years. We are very interested in
finding out the deeper reasons why', said Colin Diamond, executive
director for education in Birmingham"
"OK let's see if we can find
out what might be going wrong... (a) 2,000 primary pupils arrested
for naughtiness - Telegraph; (b) 30,000 pupils branded as
bigots as teachers log racist and homophobic jibes in playground
squabbles - Daily Mail; (c) 24,000 teachers in state
schools are incompetent, admits school watchdog - Daily Mail;
(d) Brightest pupils failed by state comprehensives (Ofsted) -
Telegraph; (e) Britain tumbles 10 places in the world's most
important school league table - Daily Mail; (f) Classrooms
have become war zones, battered and threatened, teachers say - Times
Online; (g) Five is too young to get sex education -
Telegraph; (h) Government's neo-Marxist education policy
punishes excellence - Telegraph; (i) Literacy tests for
trainee teachers show that those who can't spell, teach - Times
Online; (j) One in five children leave primary school unable
to read, write and add up properly - Daily Mail; (k) School
bans children from putting their hands up - Telegraph; (l)
School bans sugar in tea - Telegraph; (m) Successful
schools will be forced to take pupils expelled for violent and
disruptive behaviour - Daily Mail; (n) White working class
boys may become 'education underclass' - Daily Express; (o)
Children who say homosexuality is 'wrong' could be viewed as extremist
threat - Telegraph. Should I go on?"
"For half the millions
you're going to spend on consultants to come up with some PC bs answer,
I will tell you in less than 5 minutes" / "If
public [state] schools weren't failing our kids so miserably, home
schooling wouldn't be necessary... But the fact is parents actually want
their kids to have a decent education without all the propaganda and
state mandated dogma they pound into their heads" /
"'elective home education' - 8 syllables. What is with these pompous
bureaucrats that they can't write in plain, simple, descriptive
English?" HOME SCHOOLING - 3 syllables"
"If the local education
authority could be depended upon to (1) Prevent bullying; (2)
Avoid teaching erroneous dogma that homosexual lifestyles are equally
valid to heterosexual lifestyles; (3) Teach the truth about both
the good and the bad about the EU, and the various political parties;
(4) Teach history properly instead of asking children to imagine what it
would have been like to experience something that happened in the past;
(5) Teach mathematics such that children were numerate on leaving
school; (6) Teach English such that children were literate on
leaving school, and understood how to lay out a letter... then perhaps
the move to home schooling would not be such a stampede."
Specific Cases, Examples,
Issues
Barrowford Primary School, Lancashire:
"So I presume this
school made the quota of compulsory visits to the mosque and allowed
Stonewall in the classroom. Thereby telling Ofperv's inspectors that
Islam is the religion of Peace and that they are going to be gay
[sic]. None of that disgusting Christian morality taught thank
goodness!" / "I suppose they are ticking all
the correct diversity boxes. Gay [sic] is good. Tick. Buggery
acceptable. Tick. Climate change is manmade. Tick. Islam is
peaceful. Tick. British values at their best..." /
"And they shut down the Durham Free School, despite the fact they
were getting good exam results, because they were 'radical' i.e. not
PC. I weep for this country" / "The kids are
trapped between this appalling non-teaching and their mushy, gooey,
PC adhering parents. They have no chance. None"
[comments at
source].
"We now see lunatics in
control of the schools. It was always part of the degenerate agenda
of Cultural Marxism to disempower schoolteachers as well as parents,
and it's happened, brought to us by both Labour and Conservative
governments" [comment at
source].
Nursery School
in Turnham Green, West London:
"[T]hree-year-olds too
young to read or write are required to sign an agreement in which
they promise to 'be tolerant of others whatever their race, colour,
gender, class, ability, physical challenge, faith, sexual
orientation or lifestyle and refrain from using racist or homophobic
or transphobic language'. Of course we don't want children of any
age to be racist or homophobic - but isn't there something insidious
about making a child barely older than a toddler put pen to paper to
pledge they wont' be?"
[source].
[EMcD: How stupid
are these PC-deluded 'educators' of our precious children! As
these little ones are far too young to have any understanding
whatsoever of anything to which they're supposedly 'agreeing', any
so-called 'agreement' between them and the school is simply null and
void. And as the children are under the age of accountability
and thus legally under the guardianship of their parents, the
parents have every right to revoke any such 'agreement' anyway (See,
for example, Numbers 30:2-5).]
For much more on Education
please also see
here and
here.
Identity Politics
The following
extended extract is from the
article:
The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'
"Identity politics
(sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a
political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people
(in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake
of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in
European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In
shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible
enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed
and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had
responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the
cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by
this crisis to an extent was salved"
"As with any fervent ideology, a
hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and
everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation
of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to
speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of
course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying
ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of
various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of
socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity
politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated
into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the
major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"
"'Civil rights', as the first great
'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable
cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim.
The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and
widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US
history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and
obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was
seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently
separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being
presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of
'boss' versus 'worker'.
"This accident of history served to
add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in
effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'.
With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black
American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so
it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' /
'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic
minorities"
"It is only with the knowledge of how
this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above
the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as
in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in
ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice
that is particularly more pernicious"
"Indeed, the worst inter-communal
conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are
between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial'
differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there
are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the
intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel
distinguished from each other"
"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is
anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black':
inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism'
can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a
negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar
attitude to other ethnicities"
"The specific US experience, given
the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War
over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does
not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly
evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs
stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals,
who sided with them when discriminated against"
"'Racial divides' in European 'white'
host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but
affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and
secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through
in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"
[EMcD: though the latter
part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances,
this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic
doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa
(Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist
and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as
they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole
and deliberate
purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e.
any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its
longed-for global Caliphate.]
[End of Extract]
The
Frankfurt School
"The Frankfurt School
believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the
hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never reach the
state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary
to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10)
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
the family.
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
(a) attack
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
Programmes
of Treason
"There are
eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to
create a social state:
-
Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the
people;
-
Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as
possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight
back if you are providing everything for them to live;
-
Debt
- Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are
able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;
-
Gun
Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from
the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;
-
Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives
(Food, Housing, and Income);
-
Education - Take control of that people read and listen
to - take control of what children learn in school;
-
Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government
and schools;
-
Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and
the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier
to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)
Please
note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not
imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is
taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the
same authors,
or any groups or
ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any
periodicals to which they may contribute, or the
beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their
work or ministry or position. |
©
Elizabeth McDonald
https://www.bayith.org
bayith@blueyonder.co.uk
|